Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Comparing clinician descriptions of frailty and geriatric syndromes using electronic health records: a retrospective cohort study

  • Laura J. Anzaldi1, 2,
  • Ashwini Davison1, 2,
  • Cynthia M. Boyd3,
  • Bruce Leff3 and
  • Hadi Kharrazi2Email author
BMC GeriatricsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:248

Received: 6 June 2017

Accepted: 17 October 2017

Published: 25 October 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
6 Jun 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Olga Theou
12 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Clegg
11 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Laura Anzaldi
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
25 Oct 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12877-017-0645-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
Center for Population Health IT, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
Center for Transformative Geriatric Research, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA