Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the sample, and comparisons per QoL subgroup

From: Explaining discrepancies in self-reported quality of life in frail older people: a mixed-methods study

 

Sample (n = 34)

 

Low QoL (n = 18)

 

High QoL (n = 16)

 

Group differences

Socio-demographics

 Age (mean) (SD)

80.7 (7.3)

 

78.1 (6.5)

 

83.9 (7.0) a

 

*

 Females (%) (n)

61.8

21

61.1

11

62.5

10

 

 Migration background (%) (n)

8.8

3

11.1

2

6.3

1

 

Marital status (%) (n)

 Married

11.8

4

16.7

3

6.3

1

 

 Never married

11.8

4

5.6

1

18.8

3

 

 Divorced

14.7

5

27.8

5

–

0

 

 Widowed

61.8

21

50.0

9

75.0

12

 

Living arrangement (%) (n)

 Alone

67.6

23

72.2

13

62.5

10

 

 With partner

11.8

4

16.7

3

6.3

1

 

 With child(ren)

17.6

6

11.1

2

25.0

4

 

 With others

2.9

1

–

0

6.3

1

 

Cognition

 MoCA (mean, SD)

19.9 (4.1)

 

18.8 (4.4)b

 

21.2 (3.3)c

  

Frailty (mean, SD)

 Overall

50.4 (8.6)

 

53.1 (8.3)

 

47.3 (8.3)

  

 Environmental

31.3 (17.7)

 

26.7 (19.2)

 

36.6 (14.7)

  

 Physical

81.3 (22.5)

 

82.0 (21.1)

 

80.5 (24.6)

  

 Psychological

40.0 (22.9)

 

52.0 (16.2)

 

26.6 (19.7)

 

***

 Social

52.3 (18.6)

 

52.9 (15.1)

 

51.6 (22.4)

  

Quality of life

 VAS-scale (median)

6

 

6

 

9

 

***

Meaning in life

 VAS-scale (mean, SD)

7.6 (1.9)

 

6.9 (2.1)

 

8.4 (1.3)

 

*

Mastery

 VAS-scale (median)

8

 

8

 

8.5

  
  1. Note: Low QoL = ≤ 6. High QoL = ≥ 8. SD Standard Deviation, MoCA Montreal Cognitive Assessment, QoL Quality of Life, VAS Visual Analogue Scale. Cognition (MoCA): range 0–30, cut-off for Mild Cognitive Impairment is ≤ 26. Frailty (Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument): range 0–100 per domain, with higher scores indicating more severe levels of frailty
  2. *p < .05. ***p < .001
  3. a n = 15. b n = 17. c n = 13