Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of included studies

From: Exploring the evidence base for how people with dementia and their informal carers manage their medication in the community: a mixed studies review

First author & date

Journal

Aim

Sampling Method

n =

Location

Data collection

Analysis

Quality rating

Barry (2013)

International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 28, 1077-1085.

To explore community pharmacists’ experiences with and attitudes towards people with dementia (focussed on pain).

Purposive

Community pharmacists: 182

Northern Ireland

Questionnaire

Descriptive analyses and Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test

50%

Fiss (2013)

International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 28, 173-181.

To analyse the occurrence of Potentially Inappropriate Medication (PIM) taken by elderly individuals in the AGnES studies in primary care.

Convenience

Patients: 342

Germany

German PRISCUS list

Phi coefficient and multiple binary logistic regression analysis

75%

Gillespie (2015)

Dementia, 14, 47-62.

The study aimed to explore the views of ethnic minority informal caregivers of people living with dementia and their medicines management experience including the adequacy of their access to medication management information and support.

Purposive

Caregivers: 29

Australia

Focus groups and individual interviews

Thematic analysis

50%

Kaasalainen (2011)

Journal of Nursing and Healthcare of Chronic Illness, 3, 407-418.

The purpose of this grounded theory study was to explore the personal experiences related to medicines management of community-dwelling older adults diagnosed with dementia, their informal caregivers and healthcare professionals who assist them.

Theoretical sampling

Community health nurses: 10

Pharmacists: 10

Family Physicians: 6

Informal caregivers: 20

People with dementia: 11

Canada

Interviews

Grounded theory

50%

Maidment (2017)

Health Expectations, 20, 929-942.

To describe and understand the key challenges, in relation to medication issues, experienced by people with dementia and their informal carers dwelling in the community and the potential role of community pharmacists

Purposive and snowball effect

Informal carers: 11

GPs: 4

Nurses: 5

Social care professionals: 3

Community pharmacists: 4 People with dementia: 4

UK

Interviews

Framework analysis

75%

McKenzie (2013)

American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & other Dementias, 28, 348-354.

The primary aim of this article is to report the implementation and adoption of the Safe Home Program and the caregiver assessments of these technologies and devices to determine which one may be used to support caregivers.

Purposive

People with dementia: 60

USA

Questionnaires and interviews

Not specified

75%

Poland (2014)

BMC Research Notes, 7, 463.

The paper aims primarily to describe the Public Patient Involvement process which was intended to inform the development of a future research proposal

Purposive

Carers: 9

UK

Focus group

Thematic analysis

100%

Smith (2014)

International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 23, 44-51.

The aims of this study were to examine the scope and range of medicines related assistance provided by informal carers of people with dementia, the problems that arise and to identify how service provision could become more responsive to these needs.

Convenience

Carers: 14

Care-recipients: 5

UK

Interviews

A framework analysis

75%

While (2012)

Dementia, 12, 734-750.

This paper examines the perspectives of the person with dementia and their carers to explore if there are any significant differences in their medicines management experiences when compared to older adults without dementia and their carers.

Purposive and snowballing approach

People with dementia: 8

Informal carers: 9

Australia

Interviews

Thematic data analysis and critical analysis

75%