Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Measuring frailty in clinical practice: a comparison of physical frailty assessment methods in a geriatric out-patient clinic

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian Buta
6 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elsa Dent
26 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Janet Pritchard
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elsa Dent
9 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian Buta
11 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Janet Pritchard
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian Buta
12 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elsa Dent
12 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Janet Pritchard
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
8 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Janet Pritchard
Resubmission - Version 5
8 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
8 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
13 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12877-017-0623-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement