This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Positive and negative outcomes of informal caregiving at home and in institutionalised long-term care: a cross-sectional study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 16 September 2016
Accepted: 2 October 2017
Published: 10 October 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|16 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jenny Ploeg|
|22 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christine Walsh|
|6 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Silke Metzelthin|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Silke Metzelthin|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Oct 2017||Editorially accepted|
|10 Oct 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12877-017-0620-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.