Skip to main content

Table 2 Pairwise cross-sectional correlations (with Bonferroni-adjusted significance level; German Ageing Survey; fifth wave; n = 7808)

From: The association of falls with loneliness and social exclusion: evidence from the DEAS German Ageing Survey

 

Social exclusion

Loneliness

Number of important people in regular contact

Gender: Female

Age in years

Marital status: other marital statuses

Monthly net equivalent income in Euro

Body-Mass-Index (BMI)

Smoking status

Consumption of alcohol

Physical activity

Subjective health

Number of physical illnesses

Fall in the preceding 12 months

Social exclusion

1.00

             

Loneliness

0.51***

1.00

            

Number of important people in regular contact

−0.08***

−0.13***

1.00

           

Gender: Female

0.03

−0.07***

0.07***

1.00

          

Age in years

0.03

−0.05**

−0.12***

−0.10***

1.00

         

Marital status: other marital statuses

0.10***

0.10***

−0.12***

0.15***

0.03

1.00

        

Monthly net equivalent income in Euro

−0.17***

−0.10***

0.12***

−0.05***

−0.09***

−0.09***

1.00

       

Body-Mass-Index (BMI)

0.07***

0.05**

−0.03

−0.11***

0.03

−0.01

−0.11***

1.00

      

Smoking status

−0.05**

−0.08***

0.03

0.10***

0.22***

−0.09***

0.03

−0.01

1.00

     

Consumption of alcohol

0.13***

0.05**

−0.09***

0.28***

0.03

0.12***

−0.17***

0.10***

0.03

1.00

    

Physical activity

0.12***

0.07***

−0.15***

−0.07***

0.09***

0.05**

−0.17***

0.19***

−0.14***

0.11***

1.00

   

Subjective health

0.24***

0.19***

−0.10***

−0.02

0.14***

0.04+

−0.16***

0.22***

−0.06***

0.15***

0.22***

1.00

  

Number of physical illnesses

0.22***

0.17***

−0.05**

−0.04*

0.35***

0.06***

−0.14***

0.21***

0.03

0.09***

0.14***

0.44***

1.00

 

Fall in the preceding 12 months

0.11***

0.09***

−0.01

0.08***

0.13***

0.06***

−0.03

0.06***

0.03

0.06***

0.04+

0.18***

0.23***

1.00

  1. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, + p < 0.10. Social exclusion was assessed using a scale developed by Bude and Lantermann (2006), ranging from 1 to 4 (higher values reflect higher perceived social exclusion); Loneliness was assessed using a short version (Gierveld and Van Tilburg 2006) of the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (Gierveld and Kamphuls 1985), ranging from 1 to 4 (higher values reflect higher perceived loneliness). Number of important people in regular contact: ranging from 0 to 9; Gender: Ref.: Male; Marital status: Ref.: married and living together with spouse; Smoking status: ranging from 1 = ‘daily’ to 4 = ‘never been a smoker’; Consumption of alcohol: ranging from 1 = ‘daily’ to 6 = ‘never’; Physical activity: ranging from 1 = ‘daily’ to 6 = ‘never’; Subjective health: ranging from 1 = ‘very good’ to 5 = ‘very bad’; Falls: Ref.: Not experiencing a fall in the preceding 12 months; Categorical variables were treated as continuous variables for reasons of simplicity