Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of procalcitonin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein for the diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock in the oldest old patients

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
31 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
3 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - J Yebenes
8 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - PJ Van der Geest
12 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hongmin Zhang
Resubmission - Version 2
12 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hongmin Zhang
Resubmission - Version 3
19 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hongmin Zhang
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
24 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hongmin Zhang
Resubmission - Version 5
24 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
25 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
1 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12877-017-0566-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement