Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A one-year follow-up study of chronic pain in community-dwelling older adults with and without neuropathic pain

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pat Schofield
20 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah McDonald
18 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Susanna Rapo-Pylkkö
Resubmission - Version 2
18 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pat Schofield
2 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah McDonald
14 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Susanna Rapo-Pylkkö
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Susanna Rapo-Pylkkö
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
6 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
19 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12877-017-0537-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement