Improving early detection initiatives: a qualitative study exploring perspectives of older people and professionals
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Nov 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ralph Möhler|
|14 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Angela Kydd|
|16 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alex Hall|
|16 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Manon Lette|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alex Hall|
|13 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Manon Lette|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|23 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12877-017-0521-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.