Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Interrater and test-retest reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the BESTest and mini-BESTest in people with increased risk of falling

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anni Brit Sternhagen Nielsen
2 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ling-Hui Chang
6 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Charlotta Hamre
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Charlotta Hamre
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Charlotta Hamre
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
5 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
20 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12877-017-0480-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement