Skip to content


  • Study protocol
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The effects of an extensive exercise programme on the progression of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

  • Kate E. Devenney1Email author,
  • Marit L. Sanders3,
  • Brian Lawlor2,
  • Marcel G. M. Olde Rikkert3,
  • Stefan Schneider4, 5 and
  • on behalf of the NeuroExercise Study Group
BMC GeriatricsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:75

Received: 29 September 2016

Accepted: 3 March 2017

Published: 22 March 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
29 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Kate Devenney
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
22 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12877-017-0457-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Discipline of Physiotherapy, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Dublin, Ireland
Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud Alzheimer Centre, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Institute of Movement and Neurosciences, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Faculty for Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Australia