Skip to main content

Table 2 Adjusted fall prevalence among different racial/ethnic groups

From: Racial-Ethnic Differences in Fall Prevalence among Older Women: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study

 

Unadjusted

Age-adjusted

Age-adjusted + comorbiditiesa

Age-adjusted + comorbiditiesa + poor health

Age-adjusted + comorbiditiesa + poor health + mobility limitation

Outcome: ≥ 1 fall in past year

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

Non-Hispanic white

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

Black

0.77b

0.80

0.75b

0.76b

0.73b

 

(0.59–1.00)

(0.61–1.04)

(0.57–0.99)

(0.58–0.99)

(0.55–0.95)

Hispanic

0.97

1.00

0.98

0.98

0.94

 

(0.74–1.27)

(0.76–1.32)

(0.74–1.30)

(0.74–1.30)

(0.71–1.24)

Asian

0.63c

0.65c

0.65c

0.64d

0.64c

 

(0.50–0.80)

(0.52–0.83)

(0.51–0.82)

(0.50–0.82)

(0.50–0.81)

Outcome: ≥ 2 falls in past year

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

Non-Hispanic white

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

Reference

Black

0.90

0.95

0.86

0.87

0.85

 

(0.64–1.27)

(0.67–1.34)

(0.60–1.24)

(0.60–1.26)

(0.59–1.23)

Hispanic

1.24

1.30

1.26

1.26

1.21

 

(0.87–1.77)

(0.90–1.87)

(0.87–1.83)

(0.87–1.83)

(0.83–1.76)

Asian

0.61d

0.63d

0.63d

0.62d

0.62d

 

(0.44–0.86)

(0.45–0.90)

(0.45–0.90)

(0.43–0.88)

(0.43–0.88)

  1. OR adjusted odds ratio, 95% CI confidence interval around the adjusted odds ratio
  2. aComorbidities include diabetes, arthritis and history of stroke
  3. bSignificantly different from non-Hispanic white after controlling for age group using logistic regression at p < 0.05
  4. cSignificantly different from non-Hispanic white after controlling for age group using logistic regression at p < 0.001
  5. dSignificantly different from non-Hispanic white after controlling for age group using logistic regression at p ≤ 0.01