| Participants (mean ± SD) | Professionals (mean ± SD) |
---|---|---|
Overall intervention | n = 23 | n = 7 |
Acceptability | 8.7 ± 0.7 | 7.6 ± 0.6 |
Because of my participation in this project… |  |  |
I received a lot of individual attention (1–5)a | 4.2 ± 0.8 |  |
I feel stronger (1–5)a | 3.7 ± 1.1 |  |
I feel better physically (1–5)a | 3.7 ± 0.9 |  |
I feel better mentally (1–5)a | 3.6 ± 1.0 |  |
Exercise programme |  | n = 4 |
Acceptability | 8.9 ± 0.8 | 7.5 ± 0.4 |
Because of my participation in this project… |  |  |
I enjoyed exercising (1–5)a | 4.5 ± 0.7 |  |
I could exercise with a goal (1–5)a | 4.3 ± 0.7 |  |
How satisfied were you with… |  |  |
the fact that the exercises were in a training group? (1–5)b | 5.0 ± 0.2 |  |
the duration of the training sessions (1 h)? (1–5)b | 4.9 ± 0.3 |  |
the supervision during the training sessions? (1–5)b | 4.9 ± 0.5 |  |
the exercises you had to perform? (1–5)b | 4.8 ± 0.4 |  |
the division of the training sessions over the week? (1–5)b | 4.1 ± 1.1 |  |
Nutrition programme |  | n = 2 |
Acceptability | 8.4 ± 1.0 | 7.5 ± 0.7 |
How satisfied were you with… |  |  |
the extent to which the dietician took your dietary preferences into account? (1–5)b | 4.6 ± 0.8 |  |
the possibility to adjust the advice? (1–5)b,c | 4.7 ± 0.7 |  |
the intake consultation with the dietician? (1–5)b | 4.5 ± 0.9 |  |
the midway evaluation consultation? (1–5)b,c | 4.6 ± 0.8 |  |
the products the dietician recommended? (1–5)b | 4.5 ± 0.8 |  |
 | Dose received | |
Exercise programme | Â | |
Training attendance (# of sessions, (% of total)) | 19.9 (86.4%) | |
Exercise intensity (% of 1RM) – Leg Press (mean ± SD) | 61.4 ± 6.4 | |
Exercise intensity (% of 1RM) – Leg Extension (mean ± SD) | 62.4 ± 12.4 | |
Nutrition programme | Â | |
Participants receiving intake (n (%)) | 23 (100%) | |
Participants receiving evaluation consultation (n (%)) | 23 (100%) | |
Compliance with taking products (mean ± SD)d | 94.2 ± 8.1 |