Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of characteristics and results of 17 included interventions (reported in 15 studies) investigating dining environment and food service (for further detail see Additional file 2)

From: Effectiveness of interventions to indirectly support food and drink intake in people with dementia: Eating and Drinking Well IN dementiA (EDWINA) systematic review

Study

Design

Setting, intervention type

No.

Dementia diagnosed

Dementia stage

Dementia type

Nutrition/hydration effect

Intake effect

Quality effect (including QoL or meaningful activity) and other outcomes

Duration

Altus 2002 [19] Period 1 USA

BA

Locked dementia unit.

Family-style meals

I = 5

C = NR

Yes

Mod-severe

AD & others

NR

NR

? Resident mealtime participation,

? Communication during meals,

? Praise by nurse

(all improved but statistical significance unclear)

5 days

Brush 2002 [20] USA

BA

2 LTC facilities.

Improved dining room lighting and table setting contrast

25

Yes

Mod-severe

NR

NR

↑ E intake

→ Quality & adequacy of food intake,

→ Functional status

4 weeks

Charras 2010 [21] France

CCT

Dementia units in nursing homes.

Shared mealtime with staff

18

Yes

Severe

AD

↑ Weight

NR

? Greater autonomy, helping with serving and clearing up, eating independently

? Increased and higher quality resident-resident and resident-staff interaction

? Longer meals

? Better food quality

? Greater staff satisfaction

(improvements based on reported observations, no significance testing)

6 months

Desai 2007 [22] Canada

CCT

2 LTC facilities,

Bulk food service and home-like setting

I = 22

C = 26

Yes

NR

AD

? BMI

↑ E intake

↑ CHO intake

↑ Protein intake

NR

3 weeks

Dunne, 2004 [23] Study 1 USA

BA

LTC unit.

High & low contrast red tableware

9

Yes

Severe

AD

NR

→ % Food intake

↑ % Fluid intake

NR

10 days

Dunne, 2004 [23] Study 2 USA

BA

LTC unit.

High & low contrast tableware (3 conditions)

9

Yes

Severe

AD

NR

→ % Food intake

→ % Fluid intake

NR

10 days each

Edwards 2013 [24] USA

BA

Specialised dementia units.

Dining area aquarium

70

Yes

severe

NR

→ Weight*

↑ Quantity of food & drink intake

NR

8 weeks

Kenkmann 2010 [25, 79] UK

CCT

6 Care homes.

Improved dining environment & atmosphere, available snacks and drinks machines, increased food choice, extended restaurant hours

I = 57

C = 48

NR

NR

NR

→ Weight

→ BMI

→ Appears hydrated

NR

→ Enjoyment of food and drink

→ Cognition

1 year

Koss 1998 [26] USA

BA

High functioning dementia unit.

Dining environment enhanced lighting and contrast

13

Yes

NR

AD

NR

→ Quantity of food intake

NR

3 weeks

McDaniel 2001 [27] USA

BA

Dementia unit.

Large bright cafeteria style dining room vs small darker room with relaxing music

16

Yes

Various

AD

→ Weight

→ E intake

→ Fluid intake

NR

2 weeks

Perivolaris 2006 [29] Period 1 Canada

BA

LTC facility.

Enhanced dining (small welcoming dining rooms, music, bread & coffee aroma, menu board, staff using cues and prompts)

11

Yes

Mod-severe

Various

NR

↑ E intake

→ Feeding ability

→ Agitation level

→ Resident satisfaction

? Residents eating more leisurely, less wandering, more relaxed (according to staff notes from focus group)

6 weeks

Ragneskog 1996 [30, 80] Sweden

BA

Nursing home.

Dinner music (soothing music, familiar tunes, pop music)

20

Yes

Mod-severe

Various

NR

? Weight

↑ Food quantity (pop music)

→ Food quantity (familiar & soothing music)

↑ Psychological wellbeing

→ Motor impairment

→ Intellectual impairment

→ Emotional impairment

? more time taken for meal

8–10 days each

Shatenstein 2000 [31] Canada

BA

Dementia unit. Decentralised food service

22

Yes

NR

AD & others

→ Weight,

→ BMI,

→ TST

→ AC

↓ Albumin

↑ % food intake,

↑ E intake,

↑ CHO intake,

↑ Protein intake

NR

10 weeks

Thomas 2009 [32] USA

BA

Nursing home.

Lunchtime music (variety of styles but familiar to participants)

12

Yes

Mod

AD

NR

? Quantity of food intake

? Anecdotal reports of increased social engagement, remaining in dining area longer, responding to music with dancing, foot tapping etc.

8 weeks

Van Ort 1995 [28] (contextual intervention) USA

BA

Secure nursing unit.

Improved dining environment (protected mealtimes, noise & distractions minimised, meals taken in dining area, seated at tables, finger foods provided)

7

Yes

Severe

NR

→ Weight

? Quantity consumed

? Greater self-feeding behaviour

? Meals did not take longer

? Those with milder dementia received more food and interacted more with their care-givers

2 weeks

Wong 2008 [33] Period 2 New Zealand

BA

Short stay assessment unit.

24 h snacks and earlier meals

40

Yes

NR

NR

↑ BMI

→ AC

? E intake

NR

12 weeks

Wong 2008 [33]

Period 4

New Zealand

BA

Short stay assessment unit.

Mealtime soothing music

28

Yes

NR

NR

↑ BMI

→ AC

? E intake

NR

12 weeks

  1. *Calculated P value = 0.65 but paper reports significant t-test results
  2. AC various measures of arm circumference, AD Alzheimer’s Disease, BA before after (pre-post) study, BMI body mass index, CCT clinical controlled trial, CHO carbohydrate, C control, E energy, Hb haemoglobin, I intervention, ICW intracellular water, LTC long term care, MCI mild cognitive impairment, MMSE mini mental state examination, MNA mini-nutritional assessment, Mod moderate, N/A not applicable, NR not reported, ONS oral nutrition supplement, PEM protein energy malnutrition, QoL quality of life, RCT randomised controlled trial, TSF triceps skinfold measure, TST triceps skinfold thickness