Skip to main content

Table 3 The effect of balance training on traditional sway Parameters under eyes closed condition. Values are means±1 SD (95 % confidence interval for means). A full Bonferroni correction (α-level 0.05/4 = 0.0125) was used for each of the four tests to achieve an overall significance level of 0.05

From: Unexpected perturbations training improves balance control and voluntary stepping times in older adults - a double blind randomized control trial

 

Group

Baseline

post-test

ANOVA (Baseline to post-test) T

ANOVA (Baseline to post-test) T x G

ML-sway (mm)

Experimental

47.9 ± 15.3

44.6 ± 15.5

F = 0.215

F = 2.247

 

Control

41.4 ± 8.8

40.5 ± 8.6

p = 0.792

p = 0.142

AP-sway (mm)

Experimental

38.6 ± 13

35.8 ± 10

F = 0.694

F = 5.315

 

Control

33.8 ± 8

33.9 ± 7

p = 0. 711

p = 0.012

Velocity(mm2/sec)

Experimental

37.7 ± 12

34.2 ± 10

F = 0.086

F = 2.609

 

Control

35.1 ± 8

35.0 ± 9

p = 0.770

p = 0.115

Sway Area (mm2)

Experimental

169.3 ± 9

148 ± 76

F = 0.056

F = 2.549

 

Control

136.6 ± 48

135 ± 5

p = 0.815

p = 0.119

  1. Note: Comparison of baseline and post-intervention between the two groups based on repeated measures ANOVA (Test × Group). Abbreviations: G group, T time, mm millimeters, s seconds