Skip to main content

Table 2 Multilevel logistic regression models of association between eating arrangement and depressive symptom by gender

From: Association between eating alone and depressive symptom in elders: a cross-sectional study

Modela

Male

Female

OR

CI

Ph

Pi

OR

CI

Ph

Pi

Model Ab

1.19

(1.05,1.33)

0.005

<0.0001

1.13

(1.03,1.23)

0.010

<0.0001

Model Bc

1.15

(1.02,1.30)

0.019

<0.0001

1.10

(1.01,1.21)

0.032

<0.0001

Model Cd

1.15

(1.01,1.30)

0.030

<0.0001

1.11

(1.01,1.21)

0.035

<0.0001

Model De

1.14

(1.01,1.29)

0.035

<0.0001

1.11

(1.01,1.22)

0.031

<0.0001

Model Ef

1.14

(1.01,1.29)

0.036

<0.0001

1.11

(1.01,1.22)

0.030

<0.0001

Model Fg

1.14

(1.00,1.29)

0.052

<0.0001

1.12

(1.01,1.24)

0.027

<0.0001

  1. aFor all the multilevel logistic regression models in this table, the variable of county/district was treated as the group variable in multilevel logistic regression
  2. bModel A was the basic model and only adjusted for age
  3. cModel B was additionally adjusted for education, employment status and perception of economic status
  4. dModel C was additionally adjusted for marriage and having a child
  5. eModel D was additionally adjusted for smoking, drinking and physical activity
  6. fModel E was additionally adjusted for underlying conditions
  7. gModel F was finally adjusted for living alone
  8. hThe P value was obtained by the multilevel logistic regression for the association between eating arrangement and depressive symptom
  9. iThe P value was obtained by the likelihood ratio test comparing multilevel logistic regression model with logistic regression model for the association between eating arrangement and depressive symptom
Back to article page

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us