Skip to main content

Table 2 PERS Subscribers’ use of and satisfaction with device

From: Purchasing and Using Personal Emergency Response Systems (PERS): how decisions are made by community-dwelling seniors in Canada

Characteristic

Focus groups (n = 20)

Interviews (n = 10)

Average length of subscription (years)

m = 3.68

m = 2.58

Who signed senior up for PERS

  

  I signed up

45 % (n = 9)

90 % (n = 9)

  Family member

25 % (n = 5)

10 % (n = 1)

  Friend or neighbour

15 % (n = 3)

-

  Doctor/health professional

-

-

  Other

10 % (n = 2)

-

How often is device worn when home?

  Every day, all the time

90 % (n = 18)

80 % (n = 8)

  Every day, but just for a few hours

-

-

  A few hours every week

-

-

  Not at all

10 % (n = 2)

20 % (n = 2)

How often is device kept within arms reach?

  Always

75 % (n = 15)

90 % (n = 9)

  Usually, but not always

15 % (n = 3)

-

  Sometimes

10 % (n = 1)

10 % (n = 1)

  Almost never

-

-

  Never

-

-

  During day but not at night

-

-

How many times have you pushed (in a non-test situation)?

23 (n = 6)

2 (n = 2)

How many of those (total) instances resulted in trips to hospital?

8 (n = 5)

1 (n = 1)

Has the PERS ever activated by accident?

  Yes

25 % (n = 5)

10 % (n = 1)

  No

50 % (n = 10)

90 % (n = 1)

  No response

25 % (n = 5)

-

Satisfaction with your PERSa

m = 5.26 SD ± 1.05

m = 5.0 SD ± 1.00

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement: “ConnectCare helps me maintain my independence”b

m = 1.15 SD ± 0.37

m = 2.5 SD ± 0.97

  1. aSatisfaction with PERS was rated on a Likert-type scale of 1 (extremely dissatisfied) to 6 (extremely satisfied)
  2. bRated on a Likert-type scale of 1(strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree)
  3. Not all numbers add up to 100 % because of non-responders in some categories