Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Geriatrics

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Factors associated with lower gait speed among the elderly living in a developing country: a cross-sectional population-based study

  • Telma de Almeida Busch1Email author,
  • Yeda Aparecida Duarte2,
  • Daniella Pires Nunes2,
  • Maria Lucia Lebrão3,
  • Michel Satya Naslavsky4,
  • Anelise dos Santos Rodrigues1 and
  • Edson AmaroJr1, 5
Contributed equally
BMC Geriatrics201515:35

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0031-2

Received: 28 September 2014

Accepted: 12 March 2015

Published: 1 April 2015

Abstract

Background

Among community-dwelling older adults, mean values for gait speed vary substantially depending not only on the population studied, but also on the methodology used. Despite the large number of studies published in developed countries, there are few population-based studies in developing countries with socioeconomic inequality and different health conditions, and this is the first study with a representative sample of population. To explore this, the association of lower gait speed with sociodemographic, anthropometric factors, mental status and physical health was incorporated participants’ weight (main weight) in the analysis of population of community-dwelling older adults living in a developing country.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional population based on a sample of 1112 older adults aged 60 years and over from Health, Wellbeing and Aging Study cohort 2010. Usual gait speed (s) to walk 3 meters was stratified by sex and height into quartiles. Multiple regression analysis was performed to investigate the independent effect of each factor associated with a slower usual gait speed.

Results

The average walking speed of the elderly was 0.81 m/s – 0.78 m/s among women and 0.86 m/s among men. In the final model, the factors associated with lower gait speed were age (OR = 3.56), literacy (OR = 3.20), difficulty in one or more IADL (OR = 2.74), presence of cardiovascular disease (OR = 2.15) and sedentarism. When we consider the 50% slower, we can add the variables handgrip strength, and the presence of COPD.

Conclusions

Gait speed is a clinical marker and an important measure of functional capacity among the elderly. Our findings suggest that lower walking speed is associated with age, education, but especially with modifiable factors such as impairment of IADL, physical inactivity and cardiovascular disease. These results reinforce how important it is for the elderly to remain active and healthy.

Keywords

GaitAgedOlder adultsWalking speed

Background

Population aging is no longer a privilege of developed countries. Brazil has over 15 million elderly people (65 years or over) according to official census (IBGE), which corresponds to around 7.6% of the total population [1].

The great challenge of aging is to maintain one’s functional capacity, an individual’s ability to independently carry out activities deemed essential. There are several insidious and silent changes that occur with aging, making the distinction between senescence and senility very difficult [2]. The decline in physical performance is inevitable, and gait speed is considered a global indicator of functional mobility [3]. Reduced speed occurs with age [4,5] even among the healthy elderly [6], and it has a significant impact on one’s health and quality of life [6,7].

The change in gait speed is associated with physiological factors [7], behavioural factors [2], and the presence of diseases [8]. It may also increase the risk of falling [9] and result in disability, hospitalization [10-14], and death [15]. Reduced speed is associated with the risk of poor health-related outcomes. It is a component of phenotypic fragility [16], and also a clinical measure of functional assessment [10,17].

In spite of the fact that many studies have provided insights into the association between gait speed and all the factors mentioned above, only healthy elderly subjects were included [18,19], or potential confounders were not considered [19,20]. These associations were not consistent across studies and few investigations have been conducted with larger community-based, and this is the first one with a random weighted sample of population carried out a two-step sampling procedure with probability proportional to size using census tracts with replacement.

The objective of our study was to identify the factors associated with a lower gait speed in a representative sample of community-dwelling older adults in a developing country with many socioeconomic inequalities.

Methods

Study design

This study is part of the SABE (Saúde, Bem Estar e Envelhecimento / Health, Well-Being and Aging) Study. The SABE Study started in 2000 as a multicentre project coordinated by the Pan-American Health Organization, and it has been conducted in seven countries in Latin America and Caribbean. In Brazil, the study has been conducted in the city of São Paulo, selected through the multiple-stage sampling of census regions and it has become a longitudinal study. Survey that included 2.143 elderly individuals aged 60 or older in the city of São Paulo. A new wave has been performed in 2006 in the São Paulo initiative, and in this city the study became longitudinal. 1115 elderly subjects were reinterviewed (cohort A06) and a new cohort (B06) was added, the elderly aged 60–64 (n = 298), totalling 1413 individuals. In 2010, a third wave was performed, 989 elderly subjects (cohorts A, n = 748 and B, n = 242) were reinterviewed and a new cohort (C) of the elderly aged 60–64 (n = 355) was added. For this study, the sample was formed by wave 2010, cohorts A, B and C, totalling 1.345 elderly subjects (60 years and over). A detailed description of the methodology used can be found in [21].

For this study, individuals who were unable to perform the specific functional test (bedridden elderly) were excluded (n = 159), as well as subjects with neurological and/ or orthopaedic diseases, or those who used assistive devices in walking, or those with motor impairment resulted from stroke or with any pathological factors that might interfere with the gait speed(n = 74). The final sample comprised 1112 individuals. Figure 1 (Flowchart). This study received approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee of (IIEPAE) the Institute of Education and Research Albert Einstein (Brazil), protocol number 1360–11. Written informed consent was obtained from the subjects at the time of the interview.
Figure 1

Flowchart of Study Sample.

Measures and instruments

All data were collected at the participants’ homes by trained research assistants, and they included an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire with items on socioeconomic variables, general health and living conditions, as well as a set of anthropometric measures. The dependent variable in the present study was gait speed. The subject was instructed to walk three meters on a straight line marked on the ground at their usual speed, and thus the obtained time (in seconds) would be counted by using a hand-held stopwatch [22]. Two measurements were made and used for this study. The lowest walking speed (m/s) was considered. Walking speed was calculated by dividing the distance by the time it takes to cover a distance.

The following were the independent variables: 1) socio-demographic variables (age, sex, ethnicity, education, conjugal situation). Two reasons justify why cut-off points of education were set at 1-3years, 4–7 and 8 and more. One of them is that 21.0% of the elderly have never attended school, and 46.4% were younger than 4 years of schooling [21]. In addition, other studies have also used the same cut-off points [23,24]; 2) anthropometric variables: weight, height, body mass index (BMI). The classification of nutritional status followed the recommendations of the Pan American Health Organization: [25] 3) general health factors (number of self-reported chronic diseases (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), arthritis, osteoporosis), self-perceived general health (good/very good, regular or poor/very poor), and physical activity were evaluated by self-reported physical activity using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) short form 8. This questionnaire determines the level of physical activity and it has been validated in a sample of the Brazilian population [26]. The practice of physical activity was assessed by the number of minutes spent per week to carry out the activities. This included walking or anything activity. The older adults who devoted 150 minutes weekly to perform moderate physical activities, or 75 minutes to vigorous physical activity, or an equivalent combination of both, were considered active [27]. It means; 4) The cognitive assessment was performed using modified Mini Mental State Examination - MMSE, validated by Icaza and Albala [28]. This instrument consists of 13 questions that are independent of the school, and its cut-off scores less than or equal to twelve; 5) The depressive symptoms as assessed by the Geriatric Depression Scale(GDS) [29] validated for the Brazilian population; it was considered as a point cut scores greater than or equal to six [30]; 6) Participants who were self-rated as being unable to perform instrumental activities of daily living, or at least one ADL, without any help were defined as dependent. Activities of Daily Living (ADL): crossing fourth walking, eating, bathing, going to the bathroom, transferring from bed to chair and getting dressed. Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL): using transportation, using the phone, going shopping, taking medication, taking care of one’s own money; 7) Assessment of motor function by Balance and Gait (Time Up and Go). The TUGT was assessed in the standard manner: patients were asked to rise from a 45 cm-high chair, walk forward 3 m at their usual walking pace, turn 180°, walk back to the chair and sit down. It was emphasized to participants that they undertake the test at their ‘usual walking pace’ [31]; 8) The handgrip strength was measured using a dynamometer. The test was performed in the dominant upper limb, in two attempts, which used the highest value obtained.

Statistical analysis

The Shapiro Will test was performed to investigate whether the continuous variable gait was normally distributed. The dependent variable was not considered normally distributed, so it was stratified into quartiles according to sex and height (Table 1). This choice of stratification was based on literature because gait speed can be expected to be reduced in individuals of greater age and of lesser height, so height was considered a confusion variable that could influence the results [32]. The first quartile consisted of individuals with lower gait speed, and the fourth quartile includes faster gait speed values. For the descriptive analysis, mean and standard error values were calculated for the continuous variables, and proportions were calculated for the categorical variables. Differences between groups were estimated using the Wald test of mean equality and the Chi-Square Rao-Scott correction, which considers sample weights for estimates with population weights [33]. We adapted the significance level for the tests a p value <0.05.
Table 1

Gait speed stratified into quartiles according to sex and height

  

Men

Women

 

Quartile

height ≤ 1,66m

height > 1,66m

height ≤ 1,52m

height > 1,52m

Gait speed (m/s)

1º quartile

≤ 0,68

≤ 0,78

≤ 0,63

≤ 0,68

2º quartile

0,69 – 0,81

0,79 – 0,90

0,63 – 0,78

0,69 – 0,81

3º quartile

0,82 – 0,97

0,91 – 1,04

0,79 – 0,91

0,82 – 0,95

4º quartile

≥ 0,98

≥ 1,05

≥ 0,92

≥ 0,96

To investigate the factors associated with lower gait speed, a multinomial logistic regression was chosen. To multiple analyses, variables with p-value <0.20 were selected in the univariate analysis. In the final model, a significance level of 5%was considered. The software used was Stata ® version. The survey commands of the statistical software Stata 10 was used to analyze the data considering the complex sample design. Thus, the participants’ weight (main weight) was incorporated in the analysis.

Results

Most elderly subjects were women (60.3%), white ethnicity (self-declared) (58.4%), had between four and seven years of study (38.1%), lived with someone else (56.7%), self-reported regular health (51%), were inactive (59.6%), had two or more chronic diseases (54.4%) and 48.3% were overweight. Prevalence values found were 7.5% for cognitive impairment and 17.6% for depressive symptoms. Regarding disability, 33% were dependent in at least one IADL and 24.7% in at least one ADL.

The average walking speed of the subjects was 0.81 m/s – 0.78 m/s among women, and 0.86 m/s among men. It was observed that gait speed decreased with older ages (p = 0.000). Among people aged 75 years or older, 46.9% and 38.7% illiterate were in the first quartile of gait speed, (p<0.001) (Table 2). Race/ethnicity had no effect on walking speed (p = 0.939). Many factors revealed significant association with lower gait speed as being illiterate (38.7%), living alone (30.0%), bad or very bad self-reported health (43%), and cognitive impairment (60.4%) (Table 3). Lower handgrip strength of the dominant hand, higher TUG, having some kind of inability, at least one ADL or IADL, and having 2 or more chronic diseases such as AVC or DCV composed the first quartile (Table 3).
Table 2

Distribution (%) of older adults according to gait speed quartiles

Variables

 

Gait speed (%)

Value p

Total

1° Q

2° Q

3° Q

4° Q

Age

     

0.000

 60-74 years

74.9

17.6

30.8

27.5

24.0

 

 75 years and more

25.1

46.9

27.3

16.1

9.7

 

Sex

     

0.987

 Male

39.7

25.3

29.3

24.7

20.7

 

 Female

60.3

24.8

30.3

24.7

20.2

 

Ethnicity

     

0.939

 No White

41.6

25.7

29.9

24.7

19.7

 

 White

58.4

24.6

29.7

24.8

21.0

 

Education

     

0.000

 Illiterate

11.8

38.7

35.8

16.4

9.1

 

 1 to 3 years

22.4

31.4

34.3

18.0

16.3

 

 4 to 7 years

38.1

25.6

29.5

27.3

17.6

 

 8 years and more

27.7

13.0

24.5

29.9

32.6

 

Conjugal situation

     

0.001

 with someone

43.3

21.4

30.0

24.5

24.1

 

 Alone

56.7

30.0

29.2

25.1

15.7

 

BMI

     

0.701

 Underweight

12.5

27.7

32.1

24.5

15.2

 

 Eutrophic

39.2

23.9

28.3

26.0

21.8

 

 Overweight

48.3

25.2

30.7

23.4

20.6

 

Enough income

     

0.044

 No

42.9

18.5

22.5

34.8

24.0

 

 Yes

57.1

21.8

26.6

26.3

25.3

 

São Paulo-SP, Brazil. SABE Study, 2010. (n = 1112).

Abbreviations: BMI: Body Mass Index. Income level is presented as monthly income measured in multiples of the minimum wage.

Table 3

Health status and lifestyle according to gait speed of elderly in São Paulo-SP, Br

Variables

Total

Gait speed (%)

Value p

1° Q

2° Q

3° Q

4° Q

Handgrip - (SE)*

25.8 (0.4)

22.9(0.7)

25.0 (0.6)

27.0(0.7)

28.6(0.9

0.000

TUG/mean (SE)**

12.9 (0.2)

17.6 (0.4)

12.6 (0.1)

11.1 (0.2)

9.7 (0.1)

0.000

Self-rated health

     

0.000

 Very good

51.0

16.1

30.3

28.0

25.6

 

 Regular

42.5

28.4

30.0

25.1

16.5

 

 Bad/very bad

6.5

43.0

25.6

13.2

18.1

 

Cognitive mpairment

     

0.000

 Yes

7.5

60.4

29.0

3.8

6.7

 

 No

92.5

22.1

30.0

26.3

21.5

 

Depression

     

0.006

 Yes

17.6

28.2

36.4

21.1

14.3

 

 No

82.4

21.9

28.8

26.7

22.6

 

Physical activity

     

0.070

 Sedentary

59.6

28.1

29.8

23.6

18.5

 

 Active

40.4

20.4

30.1

26.2

23.3

 

IADL disability

     

0.000

 No

67.0

16.7

27.9

29.8

25.5

 

 Yes

33.0

41.3

33.9

14.5

10.4

 

BADL disability

     

0.000

 No

75.3

19.6

29.5

27.9

23.0

 

 Yes

24.7

41.5

31.2

14.7

12.6

 

Chronic disease

     

0.004

 None

16.8

17.6

29.7

24.8

27.9

 

 1

28.8

20.3

28.7

26.7

24.2

 

 2 or more

54.4

29.8

30.6

23.5

16.1

 

Hipertension

66.4

28.6

29.6

23.2

18.6

0.003

Diabetes

25.3

27.0

30.7

23.2

19.1

0.727

COPD

9.3

24.3

44.5

22.8

8.4

0.001

DCV

22.8

32.6

31.8

24.5

11.1

0.000

AVC

3.5

58.3

23.8

10.1

7.8

0.000

Artrithis

32.3

28.9

32.5

23.4

15.2

0.012

SABE Study, 2010.

Abbreviations: COPD:Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, DCV:Cardiovascular Disease, AVC: Cerebrovascular Accident. SE: Standard Error *TesteWald: the means are statistically different from each other in walking speed quartiles (p <0.05) except between the means of the 1st and 2nd quartiles (p = 0.186) **TesteWald: the means are statistically different from each other in walking speed quartiles (p < 0.001).

In the final model, the factors associated with lower gait speed were being older (OR = 3.56), being illiterate (OR = 3.20), having difficulty in one or more IADL (OR = 2.74), presence of cardiovascular disease (OR = 2.15) and being active as a protection factor (Table 4). When we consider the 50% slower, we can add the variables handgrip, and presence of COPD.
Table 4

Factors associated with gait speed according to quartiles of older adults

 

1°Q

p

2° Q

p

3° Q

p

Age

      

 60 to 74 y

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

 75 y and more

3.56

0.000

1.45

0.230

1.21

0.098

Education

      

 illiterate

3.20

0.017

2.97

0.024

1.74

0.216

 1 to 3y

2.78

0.003

2.17

0.011

1.10

0.779

 4 to 7 y

2.93

0.000

2.10

0.005

1.59

0.067

 8 y or more

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

Handgrip

0.98

0.154

0.97

0.023

0.98

0.362

IADL

      

 No

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Yes

2.74

0.000

1.90

0.009

1.08

0.762

DCV

      

 No

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Yes

2.15

0.006

1.82

0.037

2.05

0.017

COPD

      

 No

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Yes

1.45

0.368

2,85

0.368

2.03

0.089

Active

      

 No

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Yes

0.56

0.027

0.66

0.062

0.80

0.358

SABE Study, 2010.

Abbreviations: IADL: Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; ADL: Activities of Daily Living.

The model was adjusted for mini mental state examination, ADL, conjugal situation.

Discussion

Knowing the factors associated with lower gait speed in quartiles allows us to propose actions that target each modifiable risk criterion in ageing, and reference values from healthy individuals are important for comparison to other samples and populations with different characteristics and limitations. This is the first study in a developing country with special focus on the social determinants of health showing that poor socioeconomic conditions, together with modifiable factors, play an important role in gait speed. Being older, illiterate, having difficulty in one or more instrumental activities of daily living, the presence of cardiovascular disease and being sedentary are independent factors associated with lower walking speed among the elderly.

Our results were similar to those found worldwide [4,32]; and nationally [30,31] they indicate that gait speed decreased with older age. Our older adults, however, were significantly slower than foreign populations [34,35] and their gait speed was slower than the overall fast gait speed of participants who were 70 and older with mobility limitations living in community [36]. Bohannon (2011) found that for healthy women and men aged 70–79, the usual gait speed was 1.13 m/s and 1.26 m/s, respectively, and for those aged 80–89, the values were 0.94 and 0.97 m/s respectively [36], both higher values compared to our result. The gait speed of older adults in our study were similar to the elderly aged 80–89 living in community in Dublin(Ireland), 30 percent of whom needed more assistance to walk and longer TUG, 14.2 s (versus 5.6) compared to the Brazilian sample showed in this study [37].

Older adults aged 75 or over observed in our study were 3.56 (OR) more likely to be slower compared to younger subjects, and causal factors have been widely cited in the literature such as the loss of alpha motor neurons after the seventh decade [34], the loss of type II fibres [35] and muscle mass, with more rapid decline after age 65 [36,37] and the interposition of fat in muscle decreases muscle contraction [10].

Interestingly, comparing our results with those obtained from another sample of Brazilian elderly subjects – FIBRA network study (Frailty among Brazilian Older Adults), our average gait speed value was slower than the average of (1.11 m/s) that study. The FIBRA study included subjects from different Brazilian cities with different Human Development Indexes, at an increased average age of 71.4 [34,35,37,38]. Besides that, the percentage of illiterate older adults was smaller and the methodology was different from our research. Unlike the FIBRA study, which used a convenience sample, ours used a weigthing sample in which a weight is attributed to each individual, which indeed makes it a representative sample of the city of Sao Paulo. Other studies included volunteer subjects [33,32] or only women [34].

Maybe these differences can explain why independent associations between gait speed and educational level or income were observed only in our study. Another relevant point: our data indicate a population of elderly patients living in São Paulo with chronic diseases that affect mobility and result in low physical activity [38]. According to international literature, our older adults are deemed as frail and [39] at high risk of poor outcome [10] and poor survival [8].

Despite gait assessment being a quick, safe, inexpensive and highly reliable measure, methodology can vary widely making it difficult to compare studies. Similar methods can differ in walking length, and different populations weaken the comparisons.

Although in Studenski’s research (2011) the vast majority of the sample comprised white men and women, similar characteristics observed in our study, the mean gait speed in older adults was 0.92 m/s [8], a higher value compared to our study despite 45% of all participants being older than 85. Watson [6], analyzing data from well-functioning sub-cohort (USA), found mean gait speed of 1.20 m/s and the mean gait speed of the first quartile slower than 1.05 m/s; a higher value comparing to our results although mean age of sample was higher (75.2 years) Although the subjects in Watson’s studies were older, and 68.2% of them were sedentary, they were faster. A factor that may have influenced his study more favourably is that his sample comprised greater numbers of men and black individuals; moreover, those subjects had more education than the ones in our sample. However, similarly to our results, the participants in the lower quartile of gait speed were more likely to be older, sedentary, have less education and have more chronic health conditions.

Our results revealed that gait speed increases with the highest level of education (OR 3.20), similar to that found in Brunner’s study (2009) [40]. Years of schooling are used as a proxy for social status and, thus, health condition. Most of the elderly individuals in Brazil live in poor conditions, particularly in São Paulo, a city with great economic and social contrasts (almost 40% of the elderly subjects were illiterate). Although education alone does not ensure the end of social discrimination, it is part of the formation of a more egalitarian society and a critical factor in reducing socioeconomic disparities. Despite the positive correlation between education and income, education is considered a major factor in overcoming income inequality. Educational level is a protective factor and prevents poor outcomes in health. Individuals with more education are more likely to obtain financial resources, seek medical advice and detect diseases earlier; therefore, they have better self-reported health, get better health treatment and better understand the importance of prevention, such as doing physical activity and, thereby, decrease their chance of comorbidity. It is a fact that prevalence of chronic disease may also be influenced by an individual’s access to health services, by their socioeconomic condition, and self-reported health status [41]. Self-reported health is recognized internationally as an indicator of health status, and may justify a positive association with gait speed in bivariate analyses.

Although a positive correlation between handgrip and gait speed was observed, the handgrip association did not remain significant to the first quartile of gait speed in the final model, probably due to the fact that the subjects were already very committed in walking speed.

Regarding the TUG, our study found a mean of 12.9 s, a higher value than the results found in an meta-analysis (9.4 s) [39]. Although we did not explore the mechanisms underlying the changes observed in this study, the negative correlation found between TUG and gait speed shows the importance of evaluation of gait and balance. Gait is dependent on postural control and the integration of various systems, such as proprioceptive, visual and vestibular, their sensory input, integration in the Central Nervous System (CNS) and, depending on effective motor response [39,40] and gait assessment, it is a form of prevention against disability and motor decline [16].

Another population-based study revealed that each increment of one standard deviation in the usual gait speed was associated with a reduced likelihood of disability from 26 to 44% [41]. Similarly, our current findings revealed 33.7% of subjects disabled in one or more instrumental activities with 2.74(OR) to be on the first quartile of gait speed.

The results presented here show in bivariate analysis that the presence of cognitive impairment was significantly associated with gait speed. The same results were found in other studies, reinforcing the notion that cognition influences gait speed [6,42,43]. The significant association between gait and cognition maybe can be explained by the influence of cognitive aspects and mood on the maintenance of functional capacity, and by the need of physical and intellectual integrity to remain autonomous and independent. Although it is discussed whether cognitive decline is a predisposing or precipitating factor in the decline of gait speed [44], our data seems to indicate that the decline in physical function is secondary to cognition. Perhaps most of the older adults in São Paulo cannot afford cognitive rehabilitation services.

Regarding depression, the present results show that depression levels have a positive correlation to gait speed, which agrees with what Mossey and colleagues presented (2000) [45]. Adopting a healthier lifestyle is an important part of treating depression, e.g. doing physical activities on a regular basis. Previously published systematic reviews and meta-analysis concluded that exercise reduces depressive symptoms among patients with a chronic disease [46,47]. Research has also shown that depressed patients are less fit and have diminished physical work capacity [48], which in turn may contribute to other physical health problems. Depression in Brazil is underdiagnosed, probably because its diagnosis is often hampered by the presence of comorbidities, the difficulty of the healthcare teams to recognize it and the lack of mental health care in the primary health care system. Studies show that between 50 - 60% of the cases of depression are not detected or adequately treated [49]. Furthermore, depending on the intensity of the depressive symptoms, it becomes impossible to motivate the subject to do physical activity.

In the final model, those who considered being active showed to be significantly associated with higher walking speed. One of the important ways to prevent the insidious loss of bone and muscle strength is to stay active. When an individual loses muscle strength, walking becomes less frequent and slower, as one becomes physically unconditioned. Consequently, the individual becomes more sensitive to fatigue and, thereby, increases inactivity. Once this vicious cycle is triggered, it ends up compromising initially instrumental activities and, subsequently, the basic ones if nothing is done to halt the cycle. Physical inactivity is an important risk to cardiovascular disease. It was shown, however, that it is preventable, up to 80%, by eliminating shared risk factors such as physical inactivity [50]. Our data revealed an important association between cardiovascular diseases with the lowest quartile of gait speed in the final model. This reinforces the fact that the usual speed of gait is related to aerobic capacity showing association with functional reserve [51]. Walking imposes demands on the nervous, cardiovascular, pulmonary, musculoskeletal and hematologic systems, as they require more oxygen to contract the muscles. These systems work synergistically – if one of them does not work well, it can impair gait speed [8].

Other studies showed that regular exercise significantly improved physical fitness (aerobic capacity), walking capacity and cardiovascular dimensions [52].

Considering the relevance of this problem, Matsudo and colleagues interviewed 2001 individuals aged 14–77 in 29 cities within the state of Sao Paulo and showed that the levels of physical activity did not differ among age ranges. There were similarities between the genders, but people from metropolitan regions and the poorer ones were less active [53]. Probably the modern world with electronic novelties encourages a sedentary life style.

Another study conducted in Santos (a beach city in Brazil) recruited healthy elders of both genders as volunteers, who also led a sedentary life style. Their gait speed was 1.34 m/s among men, and 1.27 m/s among women. The values of gait speed found were significantly lower than those foreign benchmarks (p < 0.05) [32,54] but higher than our findings in São Paulo, probably because of different habits and socioeconomic backgrounds. It is important to mention that although our data has been adjusted for height, the average height of the Brazilian elderly population is shorter compared to populations of a similar age range from developed countries.

Regarding cerebrovascular disease and the lack of association with lower walking speed in the final model, it could be explained by the exclusion of all individuals with motor sequels, which could have influenced gait measures. COPD is a systemic disease that affects beyond the respiratory, cardiovascular and muscular systems. Among the muscle changes are loss of muscle mass, loss of efficiency to carry out protein synthesis, decrease in type I fibres [55,56]. There are several factors that can cause these changes in the muscular system such as chronic hypoxemia, prolonged usage of high doses of corticosteroids, nutritional changes, the response to systemic inflammation and even physical deconditioning [56]. The inability to exercise and the ventilatory limitations increase deconditioning, which ends up compromising their functionality [55]. These factors may explain the significant association between lower gait and COPD found in the bivariate analyses. However, this association was not found in the multivariate analyses. Although 54.4% of the elderly subjects reported two or more chronic diseases, 50.9% related their health as very good, which reinforces that health is no longer measured by the presence or absence of diseases, but by the degree of preservation of one’s functional capacity and independence. Such result was also evidenced by the high prevalence of elderly people without disability in basic and instrumental activities. What is at stake in old age is autonomy, the ability of the elderly to remain socially integrated and, for all purposes, health [57]. In our study, 46% of the elderly aged 75 years or over were in the first quartile, which could be related to the prevalence of more chronic diseases and worse handgrip strength; they had lower educational levels and were inactive, similar to other studies [6,9].

Study limitations

Despite the advantages of quickness and costs of the cross-sectional study, it presents limitations since it does not allow one to identify causality, whether the factors identified as associated to lower gait speed came before or after it, since expositions and outcomes are collected at the same moment. This may also explain the lack of significance between race and lower gait speed found in this study. In addition, the presence of chronic diseases, health condition, disability and physical activity were assessed by means of self -reporting, which may result in over or under-estimation of prevalence. However, participants report only those conditions diagnosed by a physician. As to physical activity, IPAQ was validated in a sample of the Brazilian population. Older adults who used assistive devices to walk, or those with severe neurological conditions, were excluded, which might limit the external validity of the study. Our current results show that poor socioeconomic conditions present in developing countries influence lower walking speed such as education, and they may be particularly related to some modifiable factors such as impairment of IADL, physical inactivity and cardiovascular disease.

Conclusion

The current results revealed an elderly population with a lower average speed compared to older adults from developed countries. A population-based cross sectional study reflected the exact condition of the elderly. It suggested that biological and socioeconomic factors such as one’s education level and lifestyle might interfere in one’s health condition, as it may also explain the different patterns of gait speed.

The identification of the factors related to lower walking speed is essential to elaborate preventive actions to be carried out before senior citizens reach worse gait speed, which can be a proxy for other conditions that lead to an undesirable health outcome. These results alert for the prevention of CVD avoiding lower gait speed and impaired functional capacity, thus reinforcing the importance for the elderly to remain active and age healthy.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the elderly people that participated in this research, and MLL for her competent and affectionate coordination of the SABE Project, which together with YAD has made this study a reality.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
(2)
Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, University of São Paulo
(3)
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo
(4)
Human Genome Research Center, University of São Paulo
(5)
Department of Radiology, University of São Paulo

References

  1. IBGE Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística: Projeções e estimativas da população do Brasil e das Unidades de Federação (2014). Accessed 31 march 2015. http://www.ibge.gov.br/apps/populacao/projecao/-.
  2. Thal DR, Del Tredici K, Braak H. Neurodegeneration in normal brain aging and disease. Sci Aging Knowledge Environ. 2004;2004(23):e26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ferrucci L, Bandinelli S, Benvenuti E, Di Iorio A, Macchi C, Harris TB, et al. Subsystems contributing to the decline in ability to walk: bridging the gap between epidemiology and geriatric practice in the InCHIANTI study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(12):1618–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Tolea MI, Costa PT, Terracciano A, Griswold M, Simonsick EM, Najjar SS, et al. Sex-specific correlates of walking speed in a wide age-ranged population. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010;65B(2):174–84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Ko SU, Hausdorff JM, Ferrucci L. Age-associated differences in the gait pattern changes of older adults during fast-speed and fatigue conditions: results from the Baltimore longitudinal study of ageing. Age Ageing. 2010;39(6):688–94.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Watson NL, Rosano C, Boudreau RM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Sutton-Tyrrell K, et al. Executive function, memory, and gait speed decline in well-functioning older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010;65(10):1093–100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Teixeira-Leite H, Manhaes AC. Association between functional alterations of senescence and senility and disorders of gait and balance. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012;67(7):719–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K, Rosano C, Faulkner K, Inzitari M, et al. Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA. 2011;305(1):50–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Quach L, Galica AM, Jones RN, Procter-Gray E, Manor B, Hannan MT, et al. The nonlinear relationship between gait speed and falls: the Maintenance of Balance, Independent Living, Intellect, and Zest in the Elderly of Boston Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(6):1069–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Andrieu S, Bauer J, Beauchet O, Bonnefoy M, et al. Gait speed at usual pace as a predictor of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people an International Academy on Nutrition and Aging (IANA) Task Force. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13(10):881–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Montero-Odasso M, Schapira M, Soriano ER, Varela M, Kaplan R, Camera LA, et al. Gait velocity as a single predictor of adverse events in healthy seniors aged 75 years and older. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60(10):1304–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cesari M, Kritchevsky SB, Penninx BW, Nicklas BJ, Simonsick EM, Newman AB, et al. Prognostic value of usual gait speed in well-functioning older people–results from the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(10):1675–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Studenski S, Perera S, Wallace D, Chandler JM, Duncan PW, Rooney E, et al. Physical performance measures in the clinical setting. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(3):314–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF, Leveille SG, Markides KS, Ostir GV, et al. Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55(4):M221–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hardy SE, Perera S, Roumani YF, Chandler JM, Studenski SA. Improvement in usual gait speed predicts better survival in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(11):1727–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Graham JE, Ostir GV, Fisher SR, Ottenbacher KJ. Assessing walking speed in clinical research: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008;14(4):552–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Camicioli R, Howieson D, Oken B, Sexton G, Kaye J. Motor slowing precedes cognitive impairment in the oldest old. Neurology. 1998;50(5):1496–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Marquis S, Moore MM, Howieson DB, Sexton G, Payami H, Kaye JA, et al. Independent predictors of cognitive decline in healthy elderly persons. Arch Neurol. 2002;59(4):601–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Waite LM, Grayson DA, Piguet O, Creasey H, Bennett HP, Broe GA. Gait slowing as a predictor of incident dementia: 6-year longitudinal data from the Sydney Older Persons Study. J Neurol Sci. 2005;229–230:89–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lebrão MLDY, organizador. O Projeto SABE no município de São Paulo: uma abordagem inicial. Brasília: Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde; 2003.Google Scholar
  22. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994;49(2):M85–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Herrera Jr E, Caramelli P, Silveira AS, Nitrini R. Epidemiologic survey of dementia in a community-dwelling Brazilian population. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2002;16(2):103–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Barreto SM, Passos VM, Lima-Costa MF. Obesity and underweight among Brazilian elderly: the Bambui Health and Aging Study. Cad Saude Publica. 2003;19(2):605–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Guía clínica para atención primaria a las personas adultas mayores / Clinical guidelines for attention primary to the older adults. In: Organización Panamericana de la Salud. División Promoción y Protección de la Salud. Programa de Salud de la Familia y Población. Unidad de Envejecimiento y Salud. Washington, DC; Organizacion Panamericana de la Salud; ene. 2003. 405 p. (OPS. Promoción de la Salud y Envejecimiento Activo. Serie Materiales de Capacitación, 1) http://www.sld.cu/galerias/pdf/sitios/gericuba/introduccion.pdf. Accessed 31 march 2015.
  26. Matsudo S, Araújo T, Matsudo V, Andrade D, Andrade E, Oliveira LC, et al. Questionário Internacional de Atividade Física (IPAQ): Estudo de validade e reprodutibilidade no Brasil. Rev Bras Ativ Fis Saúde. 2001;6(2):14.Google Scholar
  27. McGough EL, Kelly VE, Logsdon RG, McCurry SM, Cochrane BB, Engel JM, et al. Associations between physical performance and executive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: gait speed and the timed “up & go” test. Phys Ther. 2011;91(8):1198–207.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Icaza MC, Albala C. PROJETO SABE. Minimental State Examination (MMSE) del Studio de dementia en Chile: análisis estatístico. OPAS. 1999;19:1–18.Google Scholar
  29. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1982;17(1):37–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Almeida OP, Almeida SA. Reliability of the Brazilian version of the ++abbreviated form of Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) short form. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1999;57(2B):421–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):142–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Bohannon RW. Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20–79 years: reference values and determinants. Age Ageing. 1997;26(1):15–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rao J, Scott AJ. On chi-squared tests for multiway contingency tables with cell proportions estimated from survey data. Ann Stat. 1984;12(1):15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Abreu SSECC. Gait speed, balance and age: a correlational study among elderly women with and without participation in a therapeutic exercise program. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2008;12(4):7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Novaes RD MA, Dourado VZ. Usual gait speed assessment in middle-aged and elderly Brazilian subjects.2011,15 (2):117–22. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011;15(2):6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Bohannon RW, Williams Andrews A. Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2011;97(3):182–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Romero-Ortuno R, Cogan L, Cunningham CU, Kenny RA. Do older pedestrians have enough time to cross roads in Dublin? A critique of the Traffic Management Guidelines based on clinical research findings. Age Ageing. 2010;39(1):80–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ruggero CR, Bilton TL, Teixeira LF, Ramos Jde L, Alouche SR, Dias RC, et al. Gait speed correlates in a multiracial population of community-dwelling older adults living in Brazil: a cross-sectional population-based study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:182.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Bohannon RW. Grip strength predicts outcome. Age Ageing. 2006;35(3):320. author reply 320.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Horak FB, Henry SM, Shumway-Cook A. Postural perturbations: new insights for treatment of balance disorders. Phys Ther. 1997;77(5):517–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kuo HK, Leveille SG, Yen CJ, Chai HM, Chang CH, Yeh YC, et al. Exploring how peak leg power and usual gait speed are linked to late-life disability: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 1999–2002. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85(8):650–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Liu-Ambrose T, Davis JC, Nagamatsu LS, Hsu CL, Katarynych LA, Khan KM. Changes in executive functions and self-efficacy are independently associated with improved usual gait speed in older women. BMC Geriatr. 2010;10:25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Holtzer R, Verghese J, Xue X, Lipton RB. Cognitive processes related to gait velocity: results from the Einstein Aging Study. Neuropsychology. 2006;20(2):215–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Fitzpatrick AL, Buchanan CK, Nahin RL, Dekosky ST, Atkinson HH, Carlson MC, et al. Associations of gait speed and other measures of physical function with cognition in a healthy cohort of elderly persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62(11):1244–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Mossey JM, Gallagher RM, Tirumalasetti F. The effects of pain and depression on physical functioning in elderly residents of a continuing care retirement community. Pain Med. 2000;1(4):340–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Herring MP, Puetz TW, O’Connor PJ, Dishman RK. Effect of exercise training on depressive symptoms among patients with a chronic illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(2):101–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Schwandt M, Harris JE, Thomas S, Keightley M, Snaiderman A, Colantonio A. Feasibility and effect of aerobic exercise for lowering depressive symptoms among individuals with traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2012;27(2):99–103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Craft LL, Perna FM. The Benefits of Exercise for the Clinically Depressed. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;6(3):104–11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Andrade LH, Wang Y, Andreoni S, Silveira CM, Alexandrino-Silva C, Siu ER, et al. Mental Disorders in Megacities: Findings from the São Paulo Megacity Mental Health Survey, Brazil. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(2):e31879. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031879.Google Scholar
  50. 2008–2013 Action Plan for the Global Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases.Google Scholar
  51. Fiser WM, Hays NP, Rogers SC, Kajkenova O, Williams AE, Evans CM, et al. Energetics of walking in elderly people: factors related to gait speed. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010;65(12):1332–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. American College of Sports M, Chodzko-Zajko WJ, Proctor DN, Fiatarone Singh MA, Minson CT, Nigg CR, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(7):1510–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Matsudo SM, Matsudo VR, Araujo T, Andrade D, Andrade E, Oliveira L. Nível de atividade física da população do Estado de São Paulo: análise de acordo com o gênero, idade, nível socioeconômico, distribuição geográfica e de conhecimento. Rev Bras Ciên e Mov. 2002;10(4):41–50.Google Scholar
  54. Oberg T, Karsznia A, Oberg K. Basic gait parameters: reference data for normal subjects, 10–79 years of age. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1993;30(2):210–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Maltais F, LeBlanc P, Jobin J, Casaburi R. Peripheral muscle dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Chest Med. 2000;21(4):665–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Agusti A, Sauleda J, Morla M, Miralles C, Busquets X. Skeletal muscle dysfunction in COPD. Cell mechanisms. A.G.N. Arch Bronconeumol. 2001;37(4):197–205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Ramos LR. Fatores determinantes do envelhecimento saudável em idosos residentes em centro urbano: Projeto Epidoso, São Paulo. Cad Saude Publica. 2003;19:793–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Busch et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement