Skip to main content

Table 3 Model fit statistics for latent class analysis at baseline, T1, T2

From: Health status transitions in community-living elderly with complex care needs: a latent class approach

 

T0

T1

T2

 

2 classes

3 classes

4 classes

5 classes

4 classes

5 classes

4 classes

5 classes

Sequential model comparisons

2 vs. 1 classes

3 vs. 2 classes

4 vs. 3 classes

5 vs. 4 classes

4 vs. 3 classes

5 vs. 4 classes

4 vs. 3 classes

5 vs. 4 classes

LMR LRT

        

Log-likelihood value (c+1 classes)

13265.31

13595.67

12239.68

12093.26

8366.61

8119.41

4603.94

4449.05

-2 difference in log likelihood

1468.19

2711.98

292.85

107.55

494.40

108.374

309.774

77.03

p value

0.000

0.000

0.0006

0.307

0.000

0.286

0.000

0.198

Adjusted LMR LRT

1458.80

2375.46

290.97

106.86

490.03

107.64

265.99

76.43

p value

0.000

0.000

0.0006

0.309

0.000

0.289

0.000

0.198

Information criterion

        

AIC

25148.43

24483.26

24192.52

24296.97

16244.82

16348.45

9072.11

9039.11

BIC

25365.96

24493.48

24207.69

24848.37

16258.87

16858.66

9426.66

9483.32

Adjusted BIC

25229.38

24487.13

24198.16

24502.15

16249.34

16512.53

9150.57

9137.40

Entropy

0.814

0.791

0.805

0.765

0.815

0.804

0.830

0.849

Condition number

0.0029

0.309

0.233

0.0012

0.0524

0.0014

0.0301

0.022

  1. LMR-LRT = Lo-Mendell-Rubin Likelihood Ratio Test; AIC: Akaike Information Criterion; BIC: Bayesian Information Criterion.
  2. Condition number = ratio of largest Eigen value to the smallest Eigen value for the Fisher information matrix. Values less than 10E-09 indicate problem with model identification.