This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Comparing the Functional Independence Measure and the interRAI/MDS for use in the functional assessment of older adults: a review of the literature
© Glenny and Stolee; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 8 May 2009
Accepted: 29 November 2009
Published: 29 November 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 May 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Jun 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yee Sien Ng|
|14 Jul 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ying-Chih Wang|
|24 Aug 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Paul Stolee|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Aug 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Aug 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yee Sien Ng|
|8 Sep 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ying-Chih Wang|
|2 Oct 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Paul Stolee|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Oct 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Nov 2009||Editorially accepted|
|29 Nov 2009||Article published||10.1186/1471-2318-9-52|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.