This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A descriptive study of older adults with persistent pain: Use and perceived effectiveness of pain management strategies [ISRCTN11899548]
© Kemp et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 08 July 2005
Accepted: 08 November 2005
Published: 08 November 2005
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Jul 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|31 Jul 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Helme|
|1 Aug 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ingalill Hallberg|
|12 Aug 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cary Reid|
|26 Aug 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Mary Ersek|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Aug 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Sep 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cary Reid|
|27 Oct 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Mary Ersek|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Oct 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Nov 2005||Editorially accepted|
|8 Nov 2005||Article published||10.1186/1471-2318-5-12|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.