Skip to main content

Table 2 Effect of the intervention on spatio-temporal gait variables

From: Improvements in gait characteristics after intensive resistance and functional training in people with dementia: a randomised controlled trial

Gait variables

Baseline IG: n = 20 CG: n = 29

Follow-up IG: n = 20 CG: n = 29

Mean treatment difference (95% CI)a

P-valuebEffect sizec

% change from baselined

Speed, cm/sec

     

IG

132.67 ± 55.67

149.32 ± 48.21

18.32

<0.001

IG: 12.5

CG

128.66 ± 38.20

127.64 ± 35.65

(9.85 to 26.80)

1.27

CG: -0.8

Cadence, steps/min

     

IG

137.14 ± 21.13

145.39 ± 20.82

11.16

0.002

IG: 6.0

CG

134.47 ± 17.85

131.98 ± 19.17

(4.37 to 17.94)

0.96

CG: -1.9

Stride length, cm

     

IG

116.58 ± 42.55

124.82 ± 37.44

7.88

0.008

IG: 7.1

CG

115.31 ± 29.47

115.89 ± 25.66

(2.14 to 13.61)

0.80

CG: 0.5

Stride time, sec

     

IG

0.90 ± 0.15

0.84 ± 0.13

-0.08

0.001

IG: 6.7

CG

0.91 ± 0.11

0.92 ± 0.12

(-0.12 to -0.03)

0.99

CG: -1.1

Double support,% of stride time

     

IG

26.92 ± 8.93

23.04 ± 7.78

-2.89

0.001

IG: 14.4

CG

25.85 ± 6.06

25.39 ± 5.99

(-4.53 to -1.25)

1.03

CG: 1.8

Step width, cm

     

IG

11.34 ± 4.18

11.08 ± 4.95

0.001

0.999

IG: 2.3

CG

10.18 ± 4.23

9.94 ± 4.42

(-1.24 to 1.24)

0.00

CG: 2.4

Step time variability, CV

     

IG

5.24 ± 3.41

5.08 ± 2.05

-0.47

0.425

IG: 3.1

CG

5.03 ± 2.48

5.40 ± 2.56

(-1.65 to 0.71)

0.22

CG: -7.4

Walk-Ratioe

     

IG

0.43 ± 0.16

0.44 ± 0.15

-0.01

0.554

IG: 2.3

CG

0.43 ± 0.12

0.44 ± 0.11

(-.04 to 0.02)

0.18

CG: 2.3

  1. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation. IG, intervention group; CG, control group; CI, confidence interval; CV, coefficient of variation; aadjusted for baseline value using ANCOVA (Baseline values total sample, n = 49: speed 130.30 ± 45.63; cadence 135.56 ± 19.09; stride length 115.82 ± 34.98; stride time 0.90 ± 0.13; double support 26.29 ± 7.30; step time variability 5.12 ± 2.88; step width 10.66 ± 4.21; walk-ratio 0.43 ± 0.14); bP-values from ANCOVA comparing the effect of the intervention on gait parameters at follow-up adjusting for baseline values; cadjusted mean treatment difference/pooled standard deviation; dpositive scores indicate improvement; estep length/cadence ratio.