Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of 29 patients with destinations on discharge in alphabetical order, but split into those with capacity (in top portion) and those without (in bottom portion); names are fictitious and randomly chosen according to pre-determined schema

From: Going home? An ethnographic study of assessment of capacity and best interests in people with dementia being discharged from hospital

Patient

Age

Living arrangements prior to admission

Average MMSE score (range)1

Capacity decision (‘B’ implies thought to be borderline)

Discharge destination

Mrs. Bailey

90

Alone, home

18 (15–20)

Capacity (B)

Nursing Care

Mr. Cook

91

Alone, home

20 (20)

Capacity (B)

Home

Mrs. Friar

79

With husband, home

15 (15)

Capacity (B)

Home

Mrs. Gardiner

79

Alone, home

24 (20–26)

Capacity (B)

Home

Mrs. MacVicar

76

Alone, home

22 (19–24)

Capacity (B)

Nursing Care

Mrs. Mason

92

Alone, home

23 (20–28)

Capacity

Home

Mr. Mills

80

Alone, home

21 (14–26)

Capacity (B)

Home

Mr. Miner

74

With wife, home

Not assessed

Capacity (B)

Home

Mr. Priestly

84

With wife, home

18 (18)

Capacity (B)

Home

Mrs. Porter

69

Alone, Sheltered Accommodation

19 (17–20)

Capacity (B)

Residential Care

Mrs. Shearer

88

Alone, Sheltered Accommodation

21 (18–24)

Capacity

Home

Mr. Saddler

92

With son, home

14 (14)

Capacity (B)

Nursing Care

Mr. Walker

79

Alone, Sheltered Accommodation

21 (16–25)

Capacity

Home

Mrs. Baker

89

Alone, home

12 (11–15)

Lacked capacity (B)

Home

Mrs. Butler

74

Alone, home

9 (5–14)

Lacked capacity

Residential Care

Mrs. Carter

90

Alone, Sheltered Accommodation

9 (9)

Lacked capacity (B)

Residential Care

Mr. Coleman

82

With wife, home

19 (17–21)

Lacked capacity (B)

Nursing Care

Mr. Collier

74

Alone, home

28 (26–30)

Lacked capacity (B)

Residential Care

Mr. Day

91

Alone, home

14 (14)

Lacked capacity

Deceased

Mr. Fisher

82

With wife, home

Not assessed (8 prior to admission)

Lacked capacity

Residential Care

Mrs. Miller

90

Alone, Sheltered Accommodation

13 (11–14)

Lacked capacity

Nursing Care

Mrs. Parker

78

Alone, home

13 (13)

Lacked capacity (B)

Nursing Care

Mr. Ryder

87

Alone, home

12 (10–13)

Lacked capacity

Nursing Care

Mrs. Salter

88

Alone, home

7 (7)

Lacked capacity (B)

Residential Care

Mr. Shepherd

89

Alone, home

20 (20)

Lacked capacity

Nursing Care

Mrs. Tanner

85

Alone, Sheltered Accommodation

13 (8–18)

Lacked capacity (B)

Nursing Care

Mr. Tyler

83

Alone, home

15 (15)

Lacked capacity (B)

Residential Care

Mrs. Woodward-Jones

80

Alone, home

22 (18–24)

Lacked capacity (B)

Residential Care

Mrs. Wright

91

Alone, home

19 (19)

Lacked capacity (B)

Residential Care

  1. 1Table 2 records MMSE scores as averages, with the range also supplied. But these scores must be regarded with caution. The MMSE was used at different times during the person’s admission by different staff from various professional backgrounds. We are aware of at least one case in which the MMSE may have been used inaccurately; but there may have been other cases. Of course, a single score on a MMSE taken early in the person’s admission, when there may have been persisting confusion relating to the cause of the admission, cannot be compared to several MMSE scores taken late in an admission.