Skip to main content

Table 1 Risk of bias

From: The treatment of hypertension in people with dementia: a systematic review of observational studies

Source

Selection bias

Performance bias

Attrition bias

Detection bias

Publication bias

Included in synthesis?

Inclusion/exclusion criteria applied uniformly?

Confounding accounted for?

Concurrent intervention accounted for?

Missing data handling?

Outcome assessors blinded?

Diagnosis defined with valid and reliable measures?

Outcomes defined with valid and reliable measures?

Confounding variables assessed?

Outcomes pre-specified?

Suspicion of publication bias?

Amoo et al. [25]

Yes

Yes

N/A

N/A

N/A

Yes

N/A

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Andersen et al. [26]

Yes

Yes

N/A

N/A

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Davies et al. [17]

Yes

Yes

N/A

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Duron et al. [20]

Yes

Yes

N/A

N/A

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Hanon et al. [19]

Yes

Yes

N/A

N/A

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Imfeld et al. [18]

Yes

Yes

N/A

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Löppönen et al. [23]

Yes

Yes

N/A

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Műther et al. [24]

Yes

Yes

N/A

Yes – Missing data for PWD

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Poon et al. [15]

Yes

Yes

N/A

Yes – excluded

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Richards et al. [16]

Yes

Yes

N/A

N/A

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Rockwood et al. [22]

Yes

Yes

N/A

Yes*

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Vale et al. [21]

Yes

Yes

N/A

Yes 58.8% enrolled

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Zhu et al. [27]

Yes

Yes

N/A

N/A

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

  1. *11.4% not contactable, 27.9% refused (community) 3.2% not contactable, 18.3% refused (institutions).