Skip to main content

Table 2 Regression analysis for intervention (nā€‰=ā€‰85) and control (nā€‰=ā€‰70) group

From: Does improved functional performance help to reduce urinary incontinence in institutionalized older women? a multicenter randomized clinical trial

Ā 

Baseline T1

3 months T2

6 months T3

Test-statistic (T2-T1, T3-T1)

Number of participants with UI

Intervention group

40

37

40

0.66 (0.15,2.90), 0.80 (0.34,1.88)

Control group

40

38

34

Frequency incontinence episodes (Number/ 3 days); mean (sd)

Intervention group

8.0 (11.0)

6.6 (9.1)

9.0 (11.4)

āˆ’1.71 (āˆ’5.99,2.56), 1.38 (āˆ’3.03,5.79)

Control group

9.5 (11.5)

7.4 (10.1)

7.1 (9.6)

Physical Performance Test (0-28ā€ ); mean (sd)

Intervention group

17.2 (4.87)

Ā 

18.5 (4 14)

3.21 (1.81,4.62), pā€‰<ā€‰0.001

Control group

15.8 (5.16)

Ā 

14.7 (4.27)

Health Related Quality of Life SF-12 (mental; 0-100); mean (sd)

Intervention group

47.0 (14.2)

Ā 

52.0 (10.0)

0.07 (āˆ’4.24,4.39)

Control group

46.0 (12.8)

Ā 

51.3 (8.5)

Health Related Quality of Life SF-12 (physical; 0-100ā€ ); mean (sd)

Intervention group

34.7 (12.0)

Ā 

38.3 (11.6)

1.70 (āˆ’3.39,6.80)

Control group

34.1 (10.1)

Ā 

35.0 (12.1)

Specific Quality of Life (I-QOL; 0-110ā€ ); mean (sd)

Intervention group

68.9 (17.9)

Ā 

65.7 (15.6)

āˆ’3.30 (āˆ’10.2,3.63)

Control group

62.2 (17.7)

Ā 

66.2 (15.6)

  1. *corrected for chronic status.
  2. ā€  Higher score indicates better performance.