Mobility-related brain regions linking carotid intima-media thickness to specific gait performances in old age

BMC Geriatrics

Table 3 Associations of gait domains with IMT and plaque

	Model	Rhythm			Symmetry			Phase			Variability			Pace
	Model	β (95% CI)	p	R²_adj	β (95% CI)	p	R²_adj	β (95% CI)	p	R²_adj	β (95% CI)	p	R²_adj	β (95% CI)	p	R²_adj
IMT	Model 1	-0.007 (-0.087,0.073)	0.864	0.085	0.077 (0.001,0.153)	0.047	0.002	0.039 (-0.043,0.121)	0.352	0.025	-0.084 (-0.166, -0.001)	0.048	0.017	-0.221 (-0.300, -0.143)	< 0.001	0.092
IMT	Model 2	0.006 (-0.082,0.095)	0.887	0.109	0.096 (0.002,0.190)	0.045	0.001	0.033 (-0.064,0.130)	0.501	0.050	-0.086 (-0.180, 0.008)	0.074	0.025	-0.213 (-0.304, -0.121)	< 0.001	0.117
Plaque	Model 1	0.003 (-0.162,0.167)	0.973	0.079	0.003 (-0.169,0.175)	0.971	-0.002	0.006 (-0.164,0.175)	0.947	0.023	0.020 (-0.151, 0.191)	0.819	0.009	0.082 (-0.086, 0.249)	0.339	0.048
Plaque	Model 2	0.010 (-0.153,0.173)	0.903	0.095	0.001 (-0.188,0.189)	0.996	-0.001	0.043 (-0.136,0.222)	0.639	0.048	0.074 (-0.099, 0.248)	0.399	0.019	0.114 (-0.060, 0.287)	0.198	0.080

Note Standardized regression coefficients (β) and p values from linear regression models are presented. Differences significant at p < 0.05 are highlighted in bold. Model 1 was adjusted for sex and age; Model 2 was further adjusted for BMI, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical activity
Abbreviation IMT, Intima-media thickness; CI, confidence interval

ISSN: 1471-2318