Skip to main content

Table 2 Study and participants’ characteristics

From: Collaborative goal setting with elderly patients with chronic disease or multimorbidity: a systematic review

Study

Study design

Intervention

Participants

Outcomes

Junius-Walker et al., 2012 [20]

Cluster RCT

PrefCheck

Country

Germany

Doctor-patient agreement about the importance ratings of individual health problems

Determination of priorities

Rates of priority problem treatment planning

Setting

GP/PCP

Number

322 participants

Condition

Multimorbiditya

Study age criterion

≥ 70 years of age

Study age

Intervention group: M = 76.9, no range reported

Control group: M = 77.5, no range reported

Wrede et al., 2013 [21]

Cluster RCT

PrefCheck

Country

Germany

Importance ratings discussed & prioritization at consultation level, health problems level and nature of the health problem level

Setting

GP/PCP

Number

42 consultations

Condition

Multimorbiditya

Study age criterion

≥ 70 years of age

Study age

Intervention group:

M = 77.0, IQR = 71.3–81.8

Control group: M = 78.0, IQR = 75.0–81.0

Boult et al., 2008 [24]

Cluster RCT

Guided Care

Country

USA

PACICc goal-setting subscale

Setting

GP/PCP

Number

904 participants

Condition

Multimorbidityb

Study age criterion

≥ 65 years of age

Study age

Intervention group M = 77.2, range 66–106

Control group M = 78.1, range 66–96

Boyd et al., 2010 [23]

Cluster RCT

Guided Care

Country

USA

PACICc goal-setting subscale

Setting

GP/PCP

Number

904 participants

Condition

Multimorbidityb

Study age criterion

≥ 65 years of age

Study age

Intervention group M = 77.2, range 66–106

Control group M = 78.1, range 66–96

Wolff et al., 2010 [22]

Cluster RCT

Guided Care Program for Family and Friends (GCPFF)

Country

USA

PACICc goal-setting subscale ratings by caregivers

Setting

GP/PCP

Number

308 caregiver-patient pairs

Condition

Multimorbidityb

Study age criterion

≥ 65 years of age (patient)

Study age

Intervention group (patient): M = 78.0, SD = 0.6

Control group: M = 77.9, SD = 0.7

Bartels et al., 2014 [25]

RCT

Helping Older People Experience Success (HOPES)

Country

USA

Rate of completed advance directives

Setting

Community mental-health agency

Number

183 participants

Condition

SMI

Study age criterion

≥ 50 years of age

Study age

Intervention group: M = 60.3, SD = 8.0

Control group: M = 60.1, SD = 7.1

Coventry et al., 2015 [26]

Cluster RCT

Collaborative Care Model

Country

United Kingdom

PACICc goal-setting subscale

Setting

GP/PCP

Number

387 participants

Condition

DM or CHD and depressiond

Study age criterion

≥ 18 years of age

Study age

Intervention group: M = 57.9, SD = 12.0

Control group: M = 59.2, SD = 11.4

Blom et al., 2016 [27]

Cluster RCT

The Integrated Systematic Care for Older PEople (ISCOPE) study

Country

The Netherlands

Median number and percentage of goals in care plans

Setting

GP/PCP

Number

1921 participants

Condition

Multimorbidity*

Study age criterion

≥ 75 years of ages

Study age

Intervention group - not selected for care plan: M = 82.7, median = 79.2, IQR = 87.1

Intervention group-selected for care plan: M = 82.0, median = 78.8, IQR = 86.9

Control group: M = 83.7, median = 79.8, IQR = 88.0

  1. ClusterRCT Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial, GP General Practice, PCP Primary Care Practice, M mean, IQR interquartile range, USA United States of America, PACIC Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care, SMI serious mental illness, SD standard deviation, DM Diabetes Mellitus, CHD Chronic Heart Disease
  2. amultimorbidity based on geriatric assessment
  3. bmultimorbidity based on Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) scores
  4. cPatient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) [28]
  5. dPatients with diabetes mellitus and/or coronary heart disease who also had depressive symptoms for at least 2 weeks