Positive and negative influences of social participation on physical and mental health among community-dwelling elderly aged 65–70 years: a cross-sectional study in Japan
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 31 August 2016
Accepted: 11 May 2017
Published: 19 May 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|31 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elaine Wethington|
|24 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aya Toyoshima|
|6 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Kimiko Tomioka|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aya Toyoshima|
|2 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elaine Wethington|
|14 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Kimiko Tomioka|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aya Toyoshima|
|7 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Kimiko Tomioka|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|7 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|11 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|19 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12877-017-0502-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.