From: Examining the Hospital Elder Life Program in a rehabilitation setting: a pilot feasibility study
Study outcome | Intervention group (N = 35)*, ** | Usual care group (N = 36)*, ** | P-value | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Pre | Post | Change | Pre | Post | Change | Pre | Post | Change |
CAM – no. (%) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Present | 6 (17) | 1 (3) | N/A | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Absent | 29 (83) | 34 (97) | Â | 65 (98) | 65 (98) | Â | Â | Â | Â |
MoCA | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Mean score ± SD | 15.7 ± 5.6 | 17.8 ± 6.0 | 2.0 ± 4.0 | 17.4 ± 5.8 | 17.6 ± 6.1 | 0.1 ± 4.1 | P = .172 | P = .861 | P = .049 |
Short-term memory and recall | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Mean score ± SD | 0.9 ± 1.4 | 1.8 ± 1.7 | 0.8 ± 1.5 | 1.4 ± 1.6 | 1.3 ± 1.6 | −0.1 ± 1.4 | P = .198 | P = .183 | P = .006 |
FIMâ„¢ Total | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Mean score ± SD | 54.1 ± 17.8 | 80.9 ± 25.1 | 25.9 ± 16.0 | 63.7 ± 16.6 | 85.0 ± 24.1 | 20.9 ± 17.6 | P = .010 | P = .446 | P = .188 |
Cognitive | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Mean score ± SD | 22.1 ± 8.5 | 25.5 ± 7.4 | 3.3 ± 5.6 | 25.7 ± 5.8 | 27.7 ± 9.1 | 2.1 ± 7.1 | P = .016 | P = .238 | P = .406 |
Motor | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Mean score ± SD | 32.2 ± 11.8 | 55.1 ± 20.7 | 22.5 ± 14.6 | 38.0 ± 13.2 | 57.3 ± 20.4 | 18.9 ± 15.6 | P = .037 | P = .620 | P = .278 |
Rehabilitation Efficiency | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Mean score ± SD | N/A | 0.5 ± 0.3 | N/A | N/A | 0.4 ± 0.4 | N/A | N/A | P = .381 | N/A |
Number of Falls | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Mean ± SD | N/A | 0.3 ± 0.6 | N/A | N/A | 0.3 ± 0.6 | N/A | N/A | P = .785 | N/A |
Length of Stay – no. of days |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Mean ± SD | N/A | 52.3 ± 22.8 | N/A | N/A | 59.2 ± 30.2 | N/A | N/A | P = .244 | N/A |