Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics and results of included oral nutrition supplementation (ONS) interventions

From: Effectiveness of interventions to directly support food and drink intake in people with dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Design

Setting, supplement type

Number completed

Dementia stage

Dementia type

Effect on nutrition or hydration status

Effect on intake of nutrients or fluid

Quality and Other outcomes

Duration

ONS (including energy, protein and often other nutrients) plus usual food vs. usual food (with or without placebo ONS)

 Abalan 1992 France [30]

RCT

Geriatric inpatients. Proprietary ONS (‘Tonexis’) vs usual food

I = 15

C = 14

NR

AD

N/A

→ E intake

↑ Cognitive function

15 weeks

 Beck 2002 Denmark [32]

RCT

Nursing home (risk of malnourishment). Home-made ONS vs usual food

I = 8

C = 8

NR

NR

→ Weight

→ E intake

N/A

2 months

 Carlsson 2009 Sweden [34]

CCT (BA)

Group-living facilities for people with dementia. Drinkable yogurt

13

NR

Mixed

↓ Weight

→ E intake

→ Fluid intake

→ Functional status

6 months

 Carver 1995 UK [36]

RCT

Psychiatric hospital/elderly ward (under-weight).

Proprietary ONS (‘Fortisip’) vs placebo

I = 20

C = 20

NR

NR

↑ Weight

↑* BMI

→TSF

↑ MAMC

N/A

N/A

12 weeks

 de Sousa 2012 Portugal [37]

RCT

Psychiatric hospital, geriatric unit, mild dementia patients (malnourished).

ONS vs usual care & advice

I = 20

C = 15

Mild

AD

↑ Weight

 ↑ BMI

↓ Nutritional risk

→ Functional status

→ Cognitive function

3 weeks

 Faxen-Irving 2002 Sweden [38]

CCT

Group-living for people with dementia.

ONS & diet advice vs usual care

I = 21

C = 12

Mixed

Mixed

↑a Weight

↑a BMI

↑‡ TSF

→ AMC

N/A

→ ADL

↓ Cognitive function

5 months

 FICSIT Fiatarone Singh 2000 USA [39, 86–88]

RCT

Nursing home (long term rehabilitation centre).

ONS vs placebo

I = 24

C = 26

NR

NR

↑ Weight

↑ BMI

→ MAMA

→ TBW

→ E intake

→ Fluid intake

→Functional status

10 weeks

 FOPANU Carlsson 2011 Sweden [35, 89, 90]

RCT

Residential care facilities.

Protein-enriched drink (+/− exercise) vs placebo drink (+/− exercise)

I = 96

C = 95

NR

NR

→ Weight

→ ICW

N/A

→ Balance

→ Gait

→ Lower limb strength

3 months

 Gregorio 2003 Spain [40]

RCT

Nursing home residents with AD.

Proprietary ONS (‘Nutrison’) vs usual food

IG = 24

C = 74

Mod

AD

↑* BMI

↓* Nutritional risk

N/A

12 months

 Lauque 2000 France [44]

RCT

Nursing homes (risk of malnourishment).

Proprietary ONS (Clinutren, Nestle) vs usual food

I = 19

C = 22

NR

NR

→ Weight

→ BMI

↑ E intake

↑ Protein intake

→ Grip strength

2 months

 Lauque 2004 France [45]

RCT

Geriatric wards & day centres (risk of malnourishment). Proprietary ONS (Clinutren) vs usual food

I = 37

C = 43

Mod

NR

↑ Weight

↑ BMI

↑ E intake

↓ Nutritional risk

→ADL

→ Cognitive function

→ Eating behaviour

3 months

 Manders 2009 Netherlands [46]

RCT

Nursing homes.

ONS vs placebo

I = 78

C = 33

NR

NR

↑ Weight

↑ Calf circumference

N/A

→ Functional status

→ Grip strength

→ Cognitive status

24 weeks

 Navrátilová 2007 Czech Republic [47]

RCT

Institutionalised residents with AD (type of institution unclear).

Proprietary ONS (‘Nutridrink’) vs usual food

I = 50

C = 50

NR

AD

→ Weight

→ BMI

↑† E intake

↑† Protein intake

↑ Cognitive function

1 year

 Pivi 2011 Brazil [55]

RCT

Setting unclear. Proprietary supplement (Ensure with FOS®) vs usual care

I = 26

C = 27

Mild-severe

AD

↑* Weight

↑* BMI

↑* AMC

↑* AC

 → TSF

N/A

N/A

6 months

 Planas 2004 Spain [48]

CCT (BA)♣

Dementia care day centre.

ONS +/− micronutrients

I = 23

C = 21

Mild

AD

→ BMI

↑ MAMC

↑ TSF

↑ E intake

→ Cognitive function

6 months

 Simmons 2010a USA [50]

RCT

Long-term care facilities, type unclear. Between meal nutritional supplements vs. usual care

I = 18

C = 20

NR

NR

→ Weight

→ E intake

↑ Costs & staff time

6 weeks

 Souvenir I

 Scheltens 2010 USA & Europe [49, 91–96]

CCT (BA)♣

AD Treatment Centres.

Proprietary ONS (Souvenaid) vs isocaloric placebo

I = 98

C = 97

Mild

AD

→ BMI

N/A

→ Cognitive function

→ QoL

12 & 24 weeks

 Stange 2013 Germany [51, 97–99]

RCT

Nursing home (risk of malnutrition).

ONS vs usual care

I = 45

C = 42

Mod-severe

NR

↑ Weight

→ BMI

↑ UAC

↑ Calf circumference

→ E intake

→ Protein intake

→ Nutritional risk

→ Cognitive function

→ ADL

12 weeks

 Wouters-Wesseling 2002 Netherlands [53]

RCT

Nursing homes, residents with dementia.

ONS vs placebo

I = 19

C = 16

NR

Mixed

↑ Weight

→ BMI

N/A

→ Functional status

12 weeks

 Wouters-Wesseling 2006 Netherlands [52]

RCT

Psychogeriatric nursing homes (with acute infection).

ONS vs usual care

I = 18

C = 16

NR

NR

→ Weight

→ TST

→ AMC

→ E intake

→ Functional status

5 weeks

 Young 2004 Canada [54, 62, 100]

RCT

Dementia units within a nursing home. ONS vs high carbohydrate meals

I = 15

C = 19

NR

AD

↑ Weight

↑ E intake

↑ Protein intake

N/A

3 weeks

Fruit juice plus normal food vs control drink plus normal food

 Krikorian 2010a USA [42]

RCT

Community-dwelling.

Grape juice vs placebo

I = 5

C = 7

MCI

N/A

→* Weight

→* Waist

N/A

↑ Learning,

→ Spatial awareness,

→ Recall

12 weeks

 Krikorian 2010b USA [43]

CCT

Community-dwelling.

Blueberry juice vs placebo

I = 9

C = 7

MCI

N/A

→* Weight

→* Waist

N/A

? Cognition,

? Spatial awareness

12 weeks

 Krikorian 2012 USA [41]

RCT

Community-dwelling.

Grape juice vs placebo

I = 10

C = 11

MCI

N/A

→ Weight

→ Waist

N/A

NR

16 weeks

Additional snacks between meals plus usual food vs usual food

 Simmons 2010b USA [50]

RCT

Long-term care facilities.

Between meal snacks & assistance vs usual care

I = 25

C = 20

NR

NR

→ Weight

→ E intake

↑ Costs

↑ Staff time

6 weeks

Multicomponent interventions including ONS

 Beck 2010 Denmark [31, 101]

RCT

Elderly nursing home residents.

ONS, Gratin diet, exercise, oral care vs usual care

I = 54

C = 55

NR

NR

↑ Weight

↑ BMI

→ E intake

↑ Protein intake

→ Cognitive performance

→ ADL

11 weeks

 Boffelli 2004 Italy [33]

CCT (BA)

Malnourished residents of dementia unit. Individualised diet including mealtime assistance, environmental modification and ONS if required

19

Severe

Mixed

→ Weight

→ BMI

↑ Serum albumin

N/A

N/A

18 months

  1. *Variance NR; †significance stated but no p values presented; ‡Reported for females only; astatistical significance reported in paper but change data not provided so significance does not appear in meta-analysis, ♣ these were RCTs, but we used their data as before-after comparisons, so they are reported here as BA.
  2. ↑ indicates statistically significant increase; ↓ indicates statistically significant reduction; → indicates no statistically significant effect; statistical significance of all effects were checked by reviewers where data were available, and reviewers results used when they differed from the original paper.
  3. AD Alzheimer’s disease, AC Arm Circumference, ADL activities of daily living, AMC arm muscle circumference, BA before-after or pre-post, BMI body mass index, C control group, CCT controlled clinical trial (with a concurrent control arm unless indicated as BA), CDR Clinical Dementia Rating Scale, C control group, E energy, GDS Global Deterioration Scale, I intervention group, ICW intracellular water, MAMA mid-arm muscle area, MAMC mid-arm muscle circumference, MCI mild cognitive impairment, mod moderate, N/A not applicable, NR not reported, ONS oral nutritional supplement, QoL quality of life, RCT randomised controlled trial, suppl supplement, TSF triceps skin fold, TST triceps skin fold thickness, TBW total body water, UAC upper arm circumference, vs versus