Skip to main content

Table 3 Changes in music therapy versus standard care

From: Individual music therapy for managing neuropsychiatric symptoms for people with dementia and their carers: a cluster randomised controlled feasibility study

Outcome

Month 3-Baseline

Month 5-Baseline

Month 7-Baseline

n

Mean difference

95 % confidence interval

Standard error

Effect size d

p

n

Mean difference

95 % confidence interval

Standard error

Effect size d

p

n

Mean difference

95 % confidence interval

Standard error

Effect size d

p

Symptoms (NPI-NH)

Standard Care

7

−13.21

−24.50 to −1.93

5.13

1.44

0.026

7

−14.00

−24.25 to −3.76

4.66

1.69

0.012

7

−25.52

−39.10 to −11.95

6.17

2.32

0.002

Music Therapy

6

6

6

Disruptiveness (NPI-NH)

Standard care

7

−6.38

−11.53 to −1.23

1.52

2.34

0.02

7

−7.38

−11.20 to −3.57

1.73

2.39

0.001

7

−12.69

−18.50 to −6.88

2.64

2.69

0.001

Music therapy

6

6

6

Wellbeing (DCM)

Standard care

7

1.65

0.71 to 2.58

0.42

2.28

0.003

7

4.14

1.97 to 6.31

0.97

2.48

0.002

7

1.87

1.24 to 2.50

0.28

3.85

<0.001

Music therapy

5

5

5

Personal enhancers (DCM)

Standard care

 

−24.08

−97.47 to 49.32

17.06

 

0.294

 

−28.08

−86.70 to 30.55

13.63

 

0.176

 

−18.83

−37.68 to 0.026

4.38

 

0.050

Music therapy

  1. The results for the first three rows above have been obtained using the SPSS repeated measures analysis of variance procedure. The Greenhouse-Geisser statistic for checking the correlation structure is 0.85 for Symptom (NPI-NH), 0.78 for Disruptiveness (NPI-NH), and 0.82 for Wellbeing (DCM), and this has led to the decision to use the SPSS results assuming “sphericity”