Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The rationale and design of the antihypertensives and vascular, endothelial, and cognitive function (AVEC) trial in elderly hypertensives with early cognitive impairment: Role of the renin angiotensin system inhibition

BMC Geriatrics20099:48

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-9-48

Received: 24 September 2009

Accepted: 18 November 2009

Published: 18 November 2009

Abstract

Background

Prior evidence suggests that the renin angiotensin system and antihypertensives that inhibit this system play a role in cognitive, central vascular, and endothelial function. Our objective is to conduct a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial, the antihypertensives and vascular, endothelial, and cognitive function (AVEC), to compare 1 year treatment of 3 antihypertensives (lisinopril, candesartan, or hydrochlorothiazide) in their effect on memory and executive function, cerebral blood flow, and central endothelial function of seniors with hypertension and early objective evidence of executive or memory impairments.

Methods/Design

The overall experimental design of the AVEC trial is a 3-arm double blind randomized controlled clinical trial. A total of 100 community eligible individuals (60 years or older) with hypertension and early cognitive impairment are being recruited from the greater Boston area and randomized to lisinopril, candesartan, or hydrochlorothiazide ("active control") for 12 months. The goal of the intervention is to achieve blood pressure control defined as SBP < 140 mm Hg and DBP < 90 mm Hg. Additional antihypertensives are added to achieve this goal if needed. Eligible participants are those with hypertension, defined as a blood pressure 140/90 mm Hg or greater, early cognitive impairment without dementia defined (10 or less out of 15 on the executive clock draw test or 1 standard deviation below the mean on the immediate memory subtest of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status and Mini-Mental-Status-exam >20 and without clinical diagnosis of dementia or Alzheimer's disease). Individuals who are currently receiving antihypertensives are eligible to participate if the participants and the primary care providers are willing to taper their antihypertensives. Participants undergo cognitive assessment, measurements of cerebral blood flow using Transcranial Doppler, and central endothelial function by measuring changes in cerebral blood flow in response to changes in end tidal carbon dioxide at baseline (off antihypertensives), 6, and 12 months. Our outcomes are change in cognitive function score (executive and memory), cerebral blood flow, and carbon dioxide cerebral vasoreactivity.

Discussion

The AVEC trial is the first study to explore impact of antihypertensives in those who are showing early evidence of cognitive difficulties that did not reach the threshold of dementia. Success of this trial will offer new therapeutic application of antihypertensives that inhibit the renin angiotensin system and new insights in the role of this system in aging.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00605072

Background

In addition to its role in developing cardiovascular disease and stroke, hypertension is also a risk factor for cognitive impairment [15] Although blood pressure tends to decline around the time of onset of clinical cognitive impairment[3], hypertension leads to accelerated decline in those with cognitive impairment or dementia[6, 7] Of all the cognitive domains, executive function is more vulnerable to the effects of hypertension [810] Executive function is defined as the set of cognitive skills that are responsible for the planning, initiation, sequencing, and monitoring of complex goal-directed behavior[11] Seniors suffering from executive dysfunction have significant impairment in following medical advise [12] and are more likely to develop disability[13, 14] It is estimated that close to 30% of the elderly population have executive function abnormalities and are generally undetected[15, 16] No prior research has evaluated the effect of hypertension treatment on executive function or specifically enrolled those with executive dysfunction.

The process by which hypertension can affect cognitive and executive function is not clear. It is likely to be, in part, related to the cerebral blood flow (CBF) regulatory system. This is supported by the evidence that lower CBF measured by Transcranial Doppler (TCD) is associated with progressive decline in cognitive function[17] For example, in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment, lower CBF was associated with a higher risk for converting to dementia[18] Further, abnormal cerebrovascular reactivity was associated with worsening cognitive decline in patients with Alzheimer's disease[19] Hypertension is associated with a decrease in CBF over and above any effect of age [2023] Hypertension also impairs neurovascular coupling[24] and vasoreactivity to CO2, a measure of brain endothelial function[25] Taken together, this provides a rational for investigating the role of CBF regulation in the relation between hypertension and cognitive function.

From a neuro-humoral standpoint, multiple systems may be involved in the relation between hypertension and cognitive function. However, a paucity of evidence point to the renin angiotensin system (RAS). Anatomically, angiotensin II (Ang II) and its receptors are located in neurons inside the blood brain barrier and in the cerebrovascular endothelial cells and circumventricular organs[26] Functionally, Ang II has been linked with cognitive function in animal models[27] In addition, Ang II also decreases cerebral blood flow[28] and impairs neurovascular coupling[29] in hypertensive patients.

Ang II impairs endothelial function, which has been linked to poor cognitive function and early Alzheimer's disease [3033] The role of the endothelium in cognitive function, aging and hypertension has gained much attention recently [3338] Central endothelial function can be assessed indirectly by the response of CBF to changes in end-tidal CO2[39] Ang II plays a critical pathophysiological role in impairing endothelial function, especially in those with hypertension[3032, 40] Therefore we are suggesting that hypertension is associated with RAS activation and endothelial function impairment that in turn are associated with abnormal CBF regulation and cognitive and executive function impairments.

Multiple observational and experimental studies, although not universally consistent, have shown that use of antihypertensives may provide cognitive protection in the elderly population[41] However, it is not known if they provide this effect solely by lowering blood pressure or via an additional class specific effect[42] Based on our suggested pathway from hypertension to cognitive impairment, we are hypothesizing that antihypertensives that inhibit the activity of RAS lower this risk beyond just lowering blood pressure. They also restore endothelial function and cerebral blood flow regulation leading to further cognitive protection.

Drugs that inhibit RAS include angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). ACEI block ACE and decrease Ang II production, whereas ARB block the angiotensin receptor type 1 but not type 2[43, 44] ACEI and ARB may be protective against cognitive and physical impairment in hypertensives [4550] In an observational study of 1,220 Italian individuals with heart failure, treatment with ACEI was associated with improved cognitive performance[51] The Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study indicated that perindopril (ACEI) reduced the risk of incident cognitive impairment in those with a previous history of stroke[46] In the Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly trial, treatment with candesartan (ARB) was associated with a lower rate of cognitive decline only in those with Mini-Mental Status-Examination Scores between 24 and 28 compared to placebo, but not the whole sample[52] Other antihypertensives such as diuretics and calcium channel blockers may increase RAS activity through increasing renin levels[53, 54] Diuretics, which produce similar lowering blood pressure effect to ACEI and ARB, activate RAS. Studies suggest that diuretics do not demonstrate a cognitive protective effect [55].

In addition to their effect on cognitive function, animal and human studies have suggested that both ACEI and ARB are associated with improved cerebral hemodynamics[56, 57] In spontaneously hypertensive rats, treatment with ARB was associated with improved cerebral autoregulation[58], reduction in CBF decline after middle cerebral artery occlusions,[59] and normalization of the production of nitric oxide[60]. Treatment with candesartan or captopril (ACEI) was also associated with a smaller infract size after middle cerebral artery occlusion[59] In addition, ARB has a specific anti-aging effect on the cardiovascular system. For example, losartan, but not diuretic-based antihypertensive treatments, reduced heart to body weight ratio in old but not young Wister-Kyoto rats[61] In humans, studies on the effect of ACEI or ARB on cerebral hemodynamics are scarce. Work by our coauthor, Dr. Lipsitz, demonstrated that ACEI, but not other antihypertensives, improve CBF and cerebral vasoreactivity in cognitively intact hypertensive older adults[62, 63] ARB have also been found to improve cerebral autoregulation in hypertensive patients with strokes[64] and diabetes[65] Preliminary studies suggest that drugs that inhibit RAS improve endothelial function[66] For example, in hypertensive patients treated with a beta-blocker, switching to an ARB resulted in improved endothelial function, measured by flow mediated dilatation[67]

Of the two classes, recent studies have shown that ARB may be superior to ACEI or diuretics in providing neuro-protection and improving vascular function[45, 64, 68] Both type 1 and 2 angiotensin receptors are present in the brain and have opposing effects: type-1 leads to vasoconstriction, whereas type 2 receptor leads to vasodilatation, neuronal differentiation, apoptosis and axonal regeneration[69] ARB, but not ACEI inhibit the type-1 receptors leaving the type-2 receptors active. This may translate to greater cerebral dilatation and a superior protective effect. In fact, preliminary evidence suggests that ARB are superior to other antihypertensives in their ability to reduce the risk of stroke[70] They also provide greater anti-atherosclerotic effect; measured by intima-media thickness, compared to ACEI in elderly hypertensive individuals[71] Therefore, we hypothesize that ARB are superior to ACEI in their cognitive and endothelial function effect measured by TCD at the middle cerebral artery, which in turn is superior to HCTZ, a drug that activates RAS.

Our objective is to conduct a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial, the antihypertensives and vascular, endothelial, and cognitive function (AVEC), to compare 1 year treatment of 3 antihypertensives (lisinopril, candesartan, or hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)) in their effect on memory and executive function, cerebral blood flow, and central endothelial function of seniors with hypertension and early objective evidence of executive or memory decline.

Methods/Design

Experimental design and participants

The overall experimental design of the AVEC trial is a 3-arm double blind randomized controlled clinical trial. A total of 100 community eligible individuals with hypertension and early cognitive impairment are being recruited from the greater Boston area. Evaluated at the cardiovascular research laboratory at the Institute for Aging Research, and then randomized to candesartan, lisinopril, or HCTZ ("active control") for 12 months. Currently recruitment efforts include various community activities, faith-based community events, health fairs, advertisements, and mail out announcements. Figure 1 describes the flow from screening to study exit. The Institutional Review Board at the Institute for Aging Research at Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for Aged approved the study and all participants provide written informed consent.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2318-9-48/MediaObjects/12877_2009_Article_178_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Study flow of the AVEC trial from the screening tothe study exit.

Inclusion Criteria include

(1) 60 years or older; (2) hypertension: defined as a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 140 mm Hg or greater or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 90 mm Hg or greater or receiving antihypertensive medications; (3) early cognitive impairment without dementia defined as executive impairment (measured by the executive clock draw test (CLOX)) [72] or early memory impairment (measured by the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status) [73]. Both of these tests are brief (total of 15 minutes), have been validated in elderly populations and have standardized norms[72, 74]

Exclusion criteria include

(1) Intolerance to 2 of the study medications; (2) SBP >200/DBP >110 mm Hg if not on treatment or SBP > 180/DBP > 100 mm Hg if on antihypertensive therapy; (3) Mini-Mental-Status-exam (MMSE)<20 or a clinical diagnosis of dementia or Alzheimer's disease; (4) elevated serum creatinine or serum potassium at baseline; (5) receiving >2 antihypertensives; (6) Comorbid illnesses (congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus stroke); and (7) inability to perform the study procedures.

Individuals who are currently receiving 1 or 2 antihypertensives are eligible to participate if the participant and the primary care provider are willing to taper their antihypertensives. The medication is tapered while carefully monitoring blood pressure using a standard protocol in our laboratory [63].

The intervention

The intervention is treatment with lisinopril, candesartan, or HCTZ. The goal of the intervention is to achieve blood pressure control defined as SBP < 140 mm Hg and DBP < 90 mm Hg. The starting dose is 10 mg increased to 20 mg then 40 mg of lisinopril; 8 mg increased to 16 mg then 32 mg of candesartan; and 12.5 mg increased to 25 mg of HCTZ. Titration occurs every 2 weeks until blood pressure is <140/90 mm Hg. If blood pressure is still not controlled, long acting nifedipine is added at 30 mg increased to 60 mg and 90 mg in 2 week increments. If still not controlled, a beta-blocker is added at 12.5 mg increased to 25 mg and 50 mg of long-acting metoprolol.

Randomization and blinding

The randomization is performed using computer generated random numbers leading to a random allocation sequence. This random allocation is performed at the central pharmacy at Hebrew SeniorLife. Both study personnel and participants are blinded to the group assignment.

Study phases

The following are the study phases:

(i) Screen: This includes: (1) informed consent, (2) 2 seated blood pressure measurements separated by 5 minutes, (3) executive function and memory assessments, and (4) inclusion/exclusion criteria assessment. Eligible participants are scheduled for the Baseline visit. If they are receiving antihypertensives, they are also given the automated blood pressure measurement machine. Instructions on using the machine, tapering the antihypertensives, frequency of measurements, a diary, and appropriate phone numbers are provided.

(ii) Baseline evaluation and randomization: during this visit, participants undergo blood pressure measurements, cognitive assessments, physical measures, and TCD procedures. Randomization to one of the 3 antihypertensive medications occurs after the baseline visit.

(iii) Follow up: Participants are then seen every 2 weeks until blood pressure control (<140/90 mm Hg) is achieved. During these visits, blood pressure measurements, medication adjustments and assessments of potential adverse events are completed. Participants are then followed for 12 months after achieving target blood pressure (<140/90 mm Hg) and evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. At each evaluation, blood pressure, adverse events, pill count (to assess compliance), use of other medications is assessed, and blood samples are drawn as outlined in Table 1. A re-evaluation including cognitive assessment, physical measures, TCD, and medical examination are performed at 6 and 12 months.
Table 1

Study procedures at various stages of the AVEC trial

Visit

Screen

Enrollment

Baseline

Titrate*

Follow-up

Months

0

2-4 weeks

1

2-3

3

6

12

Informed Consent/Eligibility

X

X

   

X

 

Medication Inventory

 

X

X

X

X

X

X

Weight/Height

  

X

  

X

X

Blood pressure

(2 every 5 min)

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Psychological Assessment

X

 

X

  

X

X

Cerebrovascular Assessment

  

X

  

X

X

Biochemical Measures

 

X

 

X

X

X

X

Renin/Aldosterone

  

X

  

X

X

Adverse Events Screening

   

X

X

X

X

If a titration of medication needed baseline will be performed after titration and before randomization

Experimental Procedures and measures

(i) Health Interview and exam: Demographics, social history and habits, family history, medication inventory[75], physical activity using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly[76] and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) [77] data will be collected. Blood pressure is measured using standardized procedures according to the American Heart Association guidelines[78, 79]: the participant is in the sitting position, rested for 5 minutes, no caffeine or smoking 2 hours prior to measurement, appropriate cuff size (covering 60% of upper arm length and 80% of arm circumference), correct cuff placement (1-2 inches above brachial pulse on bare arm), and use of the bell of the stethoscope or an automatic calibrated blood pressure machine. The systolic blood pressure is defined as the pressure corresponding to the first korotkoff sound (K1) and the diastolic as the pressure corresponding to the last korotkoff sound (K5). Blood pressure is measured in both arms and recorded. The arm with the higher blood pressure is used throughout the study. Two blood pressure readings are performed at each visit and averaged per visit. The physical exam includes gait speed (time to walk 4 meters conducted twice), height, and weight measurements.

(ii) Neuropsychological assessment: The battery of tests we chose for both screening and for the outcome measures was selected with the following considerations: brevity, validation in a similar elderly population, and sensitivity to detect impairment change over the study period.

The screening tests include: the executive clock draw test part 1 (CLOX1) and the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) immediate memory domain. We selected the CLOX1 as a screening tool to detect those with executive function abnormalities. The subject draws a clock in response to the examiner's request. CLOX1 is sensitive to detect executive function[72] It has high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.82) and high between-rater reliability (r = 0.94, p < 0.001)[72] A score 10 or less on CLOX1 is required for eligibility[72] The RBANS immediate memory domain is a brief test to assess memory [74]. Participants are asked to repeat a list of 10 words and to repeat a short story. The reliability coefficient is 88% for the immediate memory domain. Those who score 1 standard deviation or below the age-education-specific standardized mean on this test will be eligible for the study. The Mini-Mental-Status-Examination (MMSE) is used to exclude participants with more advanced cognitive impairment. We selected this test since those who score 20 or less are more likely to have advanced cognitive impairment and dementia [80]. The inter-rater reliability of MMSE is 0.83[81]

The study outcome cognitive tests include Trail Making test (A and B), Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT-R), and the Digit Span Test. The Trail Making test requires the connection of sequentially numbered circles (A), and the connection of circles marked by numbers and letters in an alternating sequence (B). This test is considered a benchmark of executive function. We selected this test because it is sensitive to detect frontal lobe pathology in patients with increased cerebrovascular and cardiovascular risk such as those with hypertension[8, 10] The HVLT-R is a 12-item list learning test in which individuals are presented three learning and recall trials followed by a delayed recall and 24 item recognition test. The HVLT-R has been identified as an ideal memory measure for elderly patients, and appropriate reliability and validity have been shown in older individuals[82] We selected this test because it is brief and allows us to identify abnormalities in immediate vs. delayed recognition. The Digit Span Test is a brief task that assesses immediate memory/attention. It is administered using the standard format[83] It consists of a series of digits of increasing length, some of which are recited as presented, and some of which are to be recited in the reversed order[84] We selected this test since it can detect abnormalities with encoding.

(iii) Cerebral Blood Flow and its regulation: CBF autoregulation and cerebral vasoreactivity are assessed by TCD using standard procedures described previously[85] Blood flow velocity, and hence CBF, is measured at the middle cerebral artery, which has a high correlation coefficient (0.995) with invasive blood flow measurements and high reliability in elderly subjects [86]. Beat to beat heart rate and blood pressure are also measured by the Finapress system and EKG[87] The Sit-to-Stand is used to assess autoregulation by measuring continuous CBF, blood pressure and heart rate in response to postural changes in sitting and standing positions. Vasoreactivity is measured by asking participants to deeply breath air with 8% CO2 [88] followed by hyperventilation. CBF, blood pressure, and heart rate are continuously measured during hyper and hypocapnea. The change in CBF relative to the change in mean arterial pressure between sitting and standing is used to measure autoregulation. The slope of the relation between cerebrovascular conductance (mean CBF/mean arterial blood pressure) for each R-R interval and end-tidal CO2 is used to assess CO2 vasoreactivity [88].

(iv) Biochemical measurement is done to monitor for adverse events: hyperkalemia and renal failure. RAS activity is assessed using plasma renin activity and aldosterone levels[89] Plasma aldosterone is measured by a radioimmunometric assay (RIA). The Coat-A-Count procedure is a solid phase radioimmunoassay, based on aldosterone specific antibody immobilized to the wall of the polypropylene tube. 125I-labelled aldosterone competes for a fixed time with aldosterone in the patient sample for antibody sites. The sensitivity of this method is 16 pg/mL and the precision is 4-10%[90]. Plasma renin activity is measured by competitive binding radioimmunoassay (RIA) using the GammaCoat plasma renin activity RIA kit. The determination involves an initial incubation of plasma to generate angiotensin I, followed by quantification of angiotensin I by RIA. This technique is highly sensitive to low levels of 0.01 ng/mL/hour and is precise to activity that is less than 10%[91] In addition, a blood sample is drawn for storage and DNA extraction for future genetic studies.

(v) Adverse events (AE): We are screening for potential adverse events through self-report by the participant or the next of kin. These include: dizziness, vertigo, light-headedness, weakness, swollen lip or tongue or both, hospitalizations, cough, falls, angioedema, renal insufficiency, and hyperkalemia with ACEI and ARB. Hypokalemia may occur with HCTZ (potassium will be supplemented). The incidence of cough with ACEI varies but 5% is the most commonly reported rate [92]. Angioedema is extremely rare and occurs in about 0.68% of patients treated with ACEI [93]. Screening for adverse events occurs monthly by phone and during each visit where measurements of serum potassium and creatinine are performed. Emergency contact is also provided in case adverse events occur in-between visits or communications with the study personnel.

Statistical methods

All analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle. We will use Mixed Models since we have correlated repeat observations and this procedure is not significantly affected by missing data[94, 95] We will compare the change in the cognitive or CBF outcomes from baseline to 12 months between the three groups. The primary independent variable is group assignment (candesartan, lisinopril, or hydrochlorothiazide). A sample size of 100 will allow us to successfully complete at least 90 (10% drop out, 30 per group) participants. A 30 per group (90 total sample size) allows us to detect at least between group differences in the change (from baseline to 12 months) of 0.46 standard deviation units (α = 0.05; power 80%). Figure 2 provides results of power analysis for the detectable difference, sample size and power. Analysis for the safety of the intervention will be conducted by comparing the number of adverse events (cough, angioedema, leukopinea, increase in serum creatinine by more than 1 mg/dl, hyperkalemia (> = 5.5 meq/dl), hypotension (SBP < 100), dizziness, falls and hospitalization) and the number of participants who withdrew from the study in the three groups using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2318-9-48/MediaObjects/12877_2009_Article_178_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Power analysis for the minimum detectable difference between the 3 groups in the change in outcome from baseline to 12 months of the AVEC trial. (assuming alpha = 0.05 and power = 80%)

Discussion

Aging of the population will lead to increase prevalence of hypertension and cognitive difficulties. To date, there are no available data to provide guidelines for treatment of hypertension in those with cognitive impairment. The AVEC trial is the first study to explore impact of antihypertensives in those who are showing early evidence of cognitive difficulties that have not reached the threshold of dementia. Observational studies have been conflicting and some suggest that treatment of hypertension may have a negative effect on cognitive function [9698]. Therefore, a carefully performed clinical trial that selects the appropriate population to study is critical to answer the question about the impact of antihypertensives on cognitive function.

The role of the RAS in aging is important because of the available therapeutic intervention for this system. Recently, RAS is a critical system in vascular biology and recently in neuroscience. Identifying an impact of ACEI or ARB on cognitive or cerebrovascular function will provide additional mechanistic and therapeutic evidence of the role of RAS in aging.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Dr. Hajjar and the AVEC trial are supported by grant 1 K23 AG030057 from the National Institute on Aging.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Harvard Medical School
(2)
Institue for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife
(3)
Division of Gerontology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre
(4)
GRECC VA Boston Healthcare

References

  1. Kilander L, Nyman H, Boberg M, Hansson L, Lithell H: Hypertension is related to cognitive impairment: a 20-year follow-up of 999 men. Hypertension. 1998, 31: 780-786.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Paran E, Anson O, Reuveni H: Blood pressure and cognitive functioning among independent elderly. Am J Hypertens. 2003, 16: 818-826. 10.1016/S0895-7061(03)01005-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Launer LJ, Masaki K, Petrovitch H, Foley D, Havlik RJ: The association between midlife blood pressure levels and late-life cognitive function. The Honolulu-Asia Aging Study. Jama. 1995, 274: 1846-1851. 10.1001/jama.274.23.1846.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Knopman D, Boland LL, Mosley T, Howard G, Liao D, Szklo M, McGovern P, Folsom AR: Cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive decline in middle-aged adults. Neurology. 2001, 56: 42-48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Reinprecht F, Elmstahl S, Janzon L, Andre-Petersson L: Hypertension and changes of cognitive function in 81-year-old men: a 13-year follow-up of the population study "Men born in 1914", Sweden. J Hypertens. 2003, 21: 57-66. 10.1097/00004872-200301000-00014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellew KM, Pigeon JG, Stang PE, Fleischman W, Gardner RM, Baker WW: Hypertension and the rate of cognitive decline in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2004, 18: 208-213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Goldstein FC, Ashley AV, Freedman LJ, Penix L, Lah JJ, Hanfelt J, Levey AI: Hypertension and cognitive performance in African Americans with Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2005, 64: 899-901. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000164712.24389.BB.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pugh KG, Kiely DK, Milberg WP, Lipsitz LA: Selective impairment of frontal-executive cognitive function in african americans with cardiovascular risk factors. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003, 51: 1439-1444. 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51463.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Saxby BK, Harrington F, McKeith IG, Wesnes K, Ford GA: Effects of hypertension on attention, memory, and executive function in older adults. Health Psychol. 2003, 22: 587-591. 10.1037/0278-6133.22.6.587.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kuo HK, Sorond F, Iloputaife I, Gagnon M, Milberg W, Lipsitz LA: Effect of blood pressure on cognitive functions in elderly persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004, 59: 1191-1194.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Royall DR, Lauterbach EC, Cummings JL, Reeve A, Rummans TA, Kaufer DI, LaFrance WC, Coffey CE: Executive Control Function: A Review of Its Promise and Challenges for Clinical Research. A Report From the Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2002, 14: 377-405.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Royall DR, Cordes J, Polk M: Executive control and the comprehension of medical information by elderly retirees. Exp Aging Res. 1997, 23: 301-313. 10.1080/03610739708254033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cahn-Weiner DA, Malloy PF, Boyle PA, Marran M, Salloway S: Prediction of functional status from neuropsychological tests in community-dwelling elderly individuals. Clin Neuropsychol. 2000, 14: 187-195.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Royall DR, Palmer R, Chiodo LK, Polk MJ: Declining executive control in normal aging predicts change in functional status: the Freedom House Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004, 52: 346-352. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52104.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Grigsby J, Kaye K, Shetterly SM, Baxter J, Morgenstern NE, Hamman RF: Prevalence of disorders of executive cognitive functioning among the elderly: findings from the San Luis Valley Health and Aging Study. Neuroepidemiology. 2002, 21: 213-220. 10.1159/000065638.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Royall DR, Espino DV, Polk MJ, Palmer RF, Markides KS: Prevalence and patterns of executive impairment in community dwelling Mexican Americans: results from the Hispanic EPESE Study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004, 19: 926-934. 10.1002/gps.1185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ruitenberg A, den Heijer T, Bakker SL, van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Breteler MM: Cerebral hypoperfusion and clinical onset of dementia: the Rotterdam Study. Ann Neurol. 2005, 57: 789-794. 10.1002/ana.20493.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Maalikjy Akkawi N, Borroni B, Agosti C, Magoni M, Broli M, Pezzini A, Padovani A: Volume cerebral blood flow reduction in pre-clinical stage of Alzheimer disease: evidence from an ultrasonographic study. J Neurol. 2005, 252: 559-563. 10.1007/s00415-005-0689-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Silvestrini M, Pasqualetti P, Baruffaldi R, Bartolini M, Handouk Y, Matteis M, Moffa F, Provinciali L, Vernieri F: Cerebrovascular reactivity and cognitive decline in patients with Alzheimer disease. Stroke. 2006, 37: 1010-1015. 10.1161/01.STR.0000206439.62025.97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ameriso SF, Paganini-Hill A, Meiselman HJ, Fisher M: Correlates of middle cerebral artery blood velocity in the elderly. Stroke. 1990, 21: 1579-1583.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Murphy DG, DeCarli C, McIntosh AR, Daly E, Mentis MJ, Pietrini P, Szczepanik J, Schapiro MB, Grady CL, Horwitz B, Rapoport SI: Sex differences in human brain morphometry and metabolism: an in vivo quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography study on the effect of aging. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996, 53: 585-594.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Krejza J, Mariak Z, Walecki J, Szydlik P, Lewko J, Ustymowicz A: Transcranial color Doppler sonography of basal cerebral arteries in 182 healthy subjects: age and sex variability and normal reference values for blood flow parameters. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999, 172: 213-218.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Cavestri R, Radice L, Ferrarini F, Longhini M, Longhini E: Influence of erythrocyte aggregability and plasma fibrinogen concentration on CBF with aging. Acta Neurol Scand. 1992, 85: 292-298. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1992.tb01472.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kazama K, Wang G, Frys K, Anrather J, Iadecola C: Angiotensin II attenuates functional hyperemia in the mouse somatosensory cortex. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003, 285: H1890-1899.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Serrador JM, Sorond FA, Vyas M, Gagnon M, Iloputaife ID, Lipsitz LA: Cerebral pressure-flow relations in hypertensive elderly humans: transfer gain in different frequency domains. J Appl Physiol. 2005, 98: 151-159. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00471.2004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ando H, Zhou J, Macova M, Imboden H, Saavedra JM: Angiotensin II AT1 receptor blockade reverses pathological hypertrophy and inflammation in brain microvessels of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Stroke. 2004, 35: 1726-1731. 10.1161/01.STR.0000129788.26346.18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gard PR: The role of angiotensin II in cognition and behaviour. Eur J Pharmacol. 2002, 438: 1-14. 10.1016/S0014-2999(02)01283-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Saavedra JM, Nishimura Y: Angiotensin and cerebral blood flow. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 1999, 19: 553-573. 10.1023/A:1006995016403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kazama K, Anrather J, Zhou P, Girouard H, Frys K, Milner TA, Iadecola C: Angiotensin II impairs neurovascular coupling in neocortex through NADPH oxidase-derived radicals. Circ Res. 2004, 95: 1019-1026. 10.1161/01.RES.0000148637.85595.c5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Haberl RL, Decker PJ, Einhaupl KM: Angiotensin degradation products mediate endothelium-dependent dilation of rabbit brain arterioles. Circ Res. 1991, 68: 1621-1627.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Dal-Ros S, Bronner C, Schott C, Kane MO, Chataigneau M, Schini-Kerth VB, Chataigneau T: Angiotensin II-induced hypertension is associated with a selective inhibition of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor-mediated responses in the rat mesenteric artery. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009, 328: 478-486. 10.1124/jpet.108.145326.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Dimitropoulou C, Chatterjee A, McCloud L, Yetik-Anacak G, Catravas JD: Angiotensin, bradykinin and the endothelium. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2006, 255-294. full_text.Google Scholar
  33. Khalil Z, LoGiudice D, Khodr B, Maruff P, Masters C: Impaired peripheral endothelial microvascular responsiveness in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2007, 11: 25-32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ghiadoni L, Virdis A: Aging and hypertension: what about the endothelium?. J Hypertens. 2006, 24: 1243-1244. 10.1097/01.hjh.0000234100.93120.c5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Versari D, Daghini E, Virdis A, Ghiadoni L, Taddei S: The ageing endothelium, cardiovascular risk and disease in man. Exp Physiol. 2009, 94: 317-321. 10.1113/expphysiol.2008.043356.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Taddei S, Virdis A, Ghiadoni L, Versari D, Salvetti A: Endothelium, aging, and hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2006, 8: 84-89. 10.1007/s11906-006-0045-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. d'Alessio P: Aging and the endothelium. Exp Gerontol. 2004, 39: 165-171. 10.1016/j.exger.2003.10.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Moser DJ, Miller IN, Hoth KF, Correia M, Arndt S, Haynes WG: Vascular smooth muscle function is associated with initiation and processing speed in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008, 14: 535-541. 10.1017/S1355617708080697.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Ainslie PN, Murrell C, Peebles K, Swart M, Skinner MA, Williams MJ, Taylor RD: Early morning impairment in cerebral autoregulation and cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity in healthy humans: relation to endothelial function. Exp Physiol. 2007, 92: 769-777. 10.1113/expphysiol.2006.036814.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ai D, Fu Y, Guo D, Tanaka H, Wang N, Tang C, Hammock BD, Shyy JY, Zhu Y: Angiotensin II up-regulates soluble epoxide hydrolase in vascular endothelium in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 9018-9023. 10.1073/pnas.0703229104.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Murray MD, Lane KA, Gao S, Evans RM, Unverzagt FW, Hall KS, Hendrie H: Preservation of cognitive function with antihypertensive medications: a longitudinal analysis of a community-based sample of African Americans. Arch Intern Med. 2002, 162: 2090-2096. 10.1001/archinte.162.18.2090.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Manolio TA, Olson J, Longstreth WT: Hypertension and cognitive function: pathophysiologic effects of hypertension on the brain. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2003, 5: 255-261. 10.1007/s11906-003-0029-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Roig E, Perez-Villa F, Morales M, Jimenez W, Orus J, Heras M, Sanz G: Clinical implications of increased plasma angiotensin II despite ACE inhibitor therapy in patients with congestive heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2000, 21: 53-57. 10.1053/euhj.1999.1740.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Padmanabhan N, Jardine AG, McGrath JC, Connell JM: Angiotensin-converting enzyme-independent contraction to angiotensin I in human resistance arteries. Circulation. 1999, 99: 2914-2920.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Tedesco MA, Ratti G, Mennella S, Manzo G, Grieco M, Rainone AC, Iarussi D, Iacono A: Comparison of losartan and hydrochlorothiazide on cognitive function and quality of life in hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens. 1999, 12: 1130-1134. 10.1016/S0895-7061(99)00156-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Tzourio C, Anderson C, Chapman N, Woodward M, Neal B, MacMahon S, Chalmers J: Effects of blood pressure lowering with perindopril and indapamide therapy on dementia and cognitive decline in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Arch Intern Med. 2003, 163: 1069-1075. 10.1001/archinte.163.9.1069.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Cummings JL, Cole G: Alzheimer disease. Jama. 2002, 287: 2335-2338. 10.1001/jama.287.18.2335.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Benedict RH, Brandt J: Limitation of the Mini-Mental State Examination for the detection of amnesia. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1992, 5: 233-237.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Pogosova GV, Zhidko NI, Ivanishina NS, Gudkova OA, Avakian GN: [Ramipril in elderly patients with mild and moderate hypertension. Clinical efficacy, effect on cerebral blood flow and intellectual functioning]. Kardiologiia. 2003, 43: 42-47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Braszko JJ, Karwowska-Polecka W, Halicka D, Gard PR: Captopril and enalapril improve cognition and depressed mood in hypertensive patients. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2003, 14: 323-343.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Zuccala G, Onder G, Marzetti E, Monaco MR, Cesari M, Cocchi A, Carbonin P, Bernabei R: Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and variations in cognitive performance among patients with heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2005, 26: 226-233. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi058.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Skoog I, Lithell H, Hansson L, Elmfeldt D, Hofman A, Olofsson B, Trenkwalder P, Zanchetti A: Effect of baseline cognitive function and antihypertensive treatment on cognitive and cardiovascular outcomes: Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE). Am J Hypertens. 2005, 18: 1052-1059. 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.02.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wagner C, Kramer BK, Hinder M, Kieninger M, Kurtz A: T-type and L-type calcium channel blockers exert opposite effects on renin secretion and renin gene expression in conscious rats. Br J Pharmacol. 1998, 124: 579-585. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701861.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Nascimento L, Ayala JM, Baquero RA, Martinez-Maldonado M: Renin release by diuretics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1979, 208: 522-526.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Di Bari M, Pahor M, Franse LV, Shorr RI, Wan JY, Ferrucci L, Somes GW, Applegate WB: Dementia and disability outcomes in large hypertension trials: lessons learned from the systolic hypertension in the elderly program (SHEP) trial. Am J Epidemiol. 2001, 153: 72-78. 10.1093/aje/153.1.72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Sadoshima S, Nagao T, Ibayashi S, Fujishima M: Inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme modulates the autoregulation of regional cerebral blood flow in hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1994, 23: 781-785.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Dupuis F, Atkinson J, Liminana P, Chillon JM: Captopril improves cerebrovascular structure and function in old hypertensive rats. Br J Pharmacol. 2005, 144: 349-356. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Nishimura Y, Ito T, Saavedra JM: Angiotensin II AT(1) blockade normalizes cerebrovascular autoregulation and reduces cerebral ischemia in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Stroke. 2000, 31: 2478-2486.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Ito T, Yamakawa H, Bregonzio C, Terron JA, Falcon-Neri A, Saavedra JM: Protection against ischemia and improvement of cerebral blood flow in genetically hypertensive rats by chronic pretreatment with an angiotensin II AT1 antagonist. Stroke. 2002, 33: 2297-2303. 10.1161/01.STR.0000027274.03779.F3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Yamakawa H, Jezova M, Ando H, Saavedra JM: Normalization of endothelial and inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in brain microvessels of spontaneously hypertensive rats by angiotensin II AT1 receptor inhibition. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003, 23: 371-380. 10.1097/00004647-200303000-00012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Demirci B, McKeown PP, Bayraktutan U: Blockade of angiotensin II provides additional benefits in hypertension- and ageing-related cardiac and vascular dysfunctions beyond its blood pressure-lowering effects. J Hypertens. 2005, 23: 2219-2227. 10.1097/01.hjh.0000191906.03983.ee.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Hatazawa J, Shimosegawa E, Osaki Y, Ibaraki M, Oku N, Hasegawa S, Nagata K, Hirata Y, Miura Y: Long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril therapy improves cerebral perfusion reserve in patients with previous minor stroke. Stroke. 2004, 35: 2117-2122. 10.1161/01.STR.0000136034.86144.e9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Lipsitz LA, Gagnon M, Vyas M, Iloputaife I, Kiely DK, Sorond F, Serrador J, Cheng DM, Babikian V, Cupples LA: Antihypertensive therapy increases cerebral blood flow and carotid distensibility in hypertensive elderly subjects. Hypertension. 2005, 45: 216-221. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000153094.09615.11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Moriwaki H, Uno H, Nagakane Y, Hayashida K, Miyashita K, Naritomi H: Losartan, an angiotensin II (AT1) receptor antagonist, preserves cerebral blood flow in hypertensive patients with a history of stroke. J Hum Hypertens. 2004, 18: 693-699. 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001735.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Kario K, Ishikawa J, Hoshide S, Matsui Y, Morinari M, Eguchi K, Ishikawa S, Shimada K: Diabetic brain damage in hypertension: role of renin-angiotensin system. Hypertension. 2005, 45: 887-893. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000163460.07639.3f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Morimoto S, Maki K, Aota Y, Sakuma T, Iwasaka T: Beneficial effects of combination therapy with angiotensin II receptor blocker and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on vascular endothelial function. Hypertens Res. 2008, 31: 1603-1610. 10.1291/hypres.31.1603.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Schiffrin EL, Park JB, Pu Q: Effect of crossing over hypertensive patients from a beta-blocker to an angiotensin receptor antagonist on resistance artery structure and on endothelial function. J Hypertens. 2002, 20: 71-78. 10.1097/00004872-200201000-00011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Braszko JJ: AT(2) but not AT(1) receptor antagonism abolishes angiotensin II increase of the acquisition of conditioned avoidance responses in rats. Behav Brain Res. 2002, 131: 79-86. 10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00349-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Wilms H, Rosenstiel P, Unger T, Deuschl G, Lucius R: Neuroprotection with angiotensin receptor antagonists: a review of the evidence and potential mechanisms. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2005, 5: 245-253. 10.2165/00129784-200505040-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Chrysant SG, Chrysant GS: The pleiotropic effects of Angiotensin receptor blockers. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2006, 8: 261-268. 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2005.05264.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Sonoda M, Aoyagi T, Takenaka K, Uno K, Nagai R: A one-year study of the antiatherosclerotic effect of the angiotensin-II receptor blocker losartan in hypertensive patients. A comparison with angiotension-converting enzyme inhibitors. Int Heart J. 2008, 49: 95-103. 10.1536/ihj.49.95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Royall DR, Cordes JA, Polk M: CLOX: an executive clock drawing task. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998, 64: 588-594. 10.1136/jnnp.64.5.588.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Randolph C, Tierney MC, Mohr E, Chase TN: The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998, 20: 310-319. 10.1076/jcen.20.3.310.823.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Duff K, Patton D, Schoenberg MR, Mold J, Scott JG, Adams RL: Age- and education-corrected independent normative data for the RBANS in a community dwelling elderly sample. Clin Neuropsychol. 2003, 17: 351-366.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Bis JC, Smith NL, Psaty BM, Heckbert SR, Edwards KL, Lemaitre RN, Lumley T, Rosendaal FR: Angiotensinogen Met235Thr polymorphism, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy, and the risk of nonfatal stroke or myocardial infarction in hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens. 2003, 16: 1011-1017. 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2003.07.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Washburn RA, Ficker JL: Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): the relationship with activity measured by a portable accelerometer. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1999, 39: 336-340.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Lawton MP, Brody EM: Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969, 9: 179-186.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Kurtz TW, Griffin KA, Bidani AK, Davisson RL, Hall JE: Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals. Part 2: Blood pressure measurement in experimental animals: a statement for professionals from the subcommittee of professional and public education of the American Heart Association council on high blood pressure research. Hypertension. 2005, 45: 299-310. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000150857.39919.cb.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, Jones DW, Kurtz T, Sheps SG, Roccella EJ: Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension. 2005, 45: 142-161.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Crum RM, Anthony JC, Bassett SS, Folstein MF: Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. Jama. 1993, 269: 2386-2391. 10.1001/jama.269.18.2386.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975, 12: 189-198. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Shapiro AM, Benedict RH, Schretlen D, Brandt J: Construct and concurrent validity of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-revised. Clin Neuropsychol. 1999, 13: 348-358.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Kreiner DS, Ryan JJ: Memory and motor skill components of the WAIS-III Digit Symbol-Coding subtest. Clin Neuropsychol. 2001, 15: 109-113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Wechsler D: WMS-R: Wechsler Memory Scale--Revised: manual. 1987, San Antonio: Psychological Corp: Harcourt Brace JovanovichGoogle Scholar
  85. Lipsitz LA, Mukai S, Hamner J, Gagnon M, Babikian V: Dynamic regulation of middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity in aging and hypertension. Stroke. 2000, 31: 1897-1903.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Newell DW, Aaslid R: Transcranial Doppler: clinical and experimental uses. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev. 1992, 4: 122-143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Aaslid R, Markwalder TM, Nornes H: Noninvasive transcranial Doppler ultrasound recording of flow velocity in basal cerebral arteries. J Neurosurg. 1982, 57: 769-774. 10.3171/jns.1982.57.6.0769.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Lipsitz LA, Mukai S, Hamner J, Gagnon M, Babikian V: Dynamic Regulation of Middle Cerebral Artery Blood Flow Velocity in Aging and Hypertension. Stroke. 2000, 31: 1897-1903.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Cartledge S, Lawson N: Aldosterone and renin measurements. Ann Clin Biochem. 2000, 37 (Pt 3): 262-278. 10.1258/0004563001899401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Underwood RH, Williams GH: The simultaneous measurement of aldosterone, cortisol, and corticosterone in human peripheral plasma by displacement analysis. J Lab Clin Med. 1972, 79: 848-862.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Emanuel RL, Cain JP, Williams GH: Double antibody radioimmunoassay of renin activity and angiotensin II in human peripheral plasma. J Lab Clin Med. 1973, 81: 632-640.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Dicpinigaitis PV: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Induced Cough: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2006, 129: 169S-173. 10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.169S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Kostis JB, Kim HJ, Rusnak J, Casale T, Kaplan A, Corren J, Levy E: Incidence and Characteristics of Angioedema Associated With Enalapril. Arch Intern Med. 2005, 165: 1637-1642. 10.1001/archinte.165.14.1637.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Diggle P, Liang K, Zeger S: Analysis of Longitudinal Data. 1994, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  95. McCullagh P, Nelder J: Generalized Liner Models. 1987, London.: Chapman and HallGoogle Scholar
  96. Nilsson SE, Read S, Berg S, Johansson B, Melander A, Lindblad U: Low systolic blood pressure is associated with impaired cognitive function in the oldest old: longitudinal observations in a population-based sample 80 years and older. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2007, 19: 41-47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Kilander L, Nyman H, Boberg M, Lithell H: The association between low diastolic blood pressure in middle age and cognitive function in old age. A population-based study. Age Ageing. 2000, 29: 243-248. 10.1093/ageing/29.3.243.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Axelsson J, Reinprecht F, Siennicki-Lantz A, Elmstahl S: Low ambulatory blood pressure is associated with lower cognitive function in healthy elderly men. Blood Press Monit. 2008, 13: 269-275. 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32830d4be6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/48/prepub

Copyright

© Hajjar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement