Validity of a novel computerized cognitive battery for mild cognitive impairment
© Dwolatzky et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003
Received: 13 July 2003
Accepted: 02 November 2003
Published: 02 November 2003
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Jul 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Aug 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philip Schatz|
|18 Aug 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helena Kraemer|
|9 Sep 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Glen Doniger|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Sep 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 Oct 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Glen Doniger|
|23 Oct 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philip Schatz|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|23 Oct 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|28 Oct 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Glen Doniger|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|28 Oct 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|31 Oct 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helena Kraemer|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|2 Nov 2003||Editorially accepted|
|2 Nov 2003||Article published||10.1186/1471-2318-3-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.