Approaches to quality improvement in nursing homes: Lessons learned from the six-state pilot of CMS's Nursing Home Quality Initiative
- Stephanie Kissam1Email author,
- David Gifford1, 2,
- Peggy Parks^†3,
- Gail Patry†1,
- Laura Palmer†4,
- Linda Wilkes†5,
- Matthew Fitzgerald†6,
- Alice Stollenwerk Petrulis†7 and
- Leslie Barnette†8
© Kissam et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003
Received: 17 January 2003
Accepted: 16 May 2003
Published: 16 May 2003
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|17 Jan 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Feb 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marilyn Rantz|
|26 Mar 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicholas Castle|
|5 May 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Stephanie Kissam|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 May 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 May 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Stephanie Kissam|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 May 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 May 2003||Editorially accepted|
|16 May 2003||Article published||10.1186/1471-2318-3-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.