Validation of a questionnaire for assessing fecal impaction in the elderly: impact of cognitive impairment, and using a proxy
© Barcelo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 16 February 2012
Accepted: 21 February 2013
Published: 7 March 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|16 Feb 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Marta Barcelo|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Marta Barcelo|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - MARIA NABAL|
|23 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Soraia Tahan|
|17 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Marta Barcelo|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|17 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - MARIA NABAL|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|21 Feb 2013||Editorially accepted|
|7 Mar 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2318-13-24|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.