Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 18 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Namkee Choi |
| 24 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Laura Sands |
| 14 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacqueline Quail |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 14 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 31 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Namkee Choi |
| 31 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Laura Sands |
| 1 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacqueline Quail |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 1 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 1 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacqueline Quail |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 1 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 16 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Laura Sands |
| 14 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacqueline Quail |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 14 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 22 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Laura Sands |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 16 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacqueline Quail |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 16 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 19 Dec 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 19 Dec 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2318-11-86 |
You can find further information about peer review here.