Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 1 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Judy Dillworth |
| 29 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lewis Goldfrank |
| 12 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Scott Sherman |
| 27 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Bronagh Walsh |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 27 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 31 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Scott Sherman |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 24 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lewis Goldfrank |
| 28 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Judy Dillworth |
| 18 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ryan Lennon |
| 12 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Bronagh Walsh |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 12 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 6 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ryan Lennon |
| 7 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Bronagh Walsh |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 7 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 14 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Bronagh Walsh |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 14 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 18 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 18 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2318-11-62 |
You can find further information about peer review here.